On 24/08/09 4:15 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:47 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
>> extensions.conf is fully supported in Asterisk 1.6.x; there have been
>> some syntax changes (which are covered in the UPGRADE files)
>
> I was able to overcome a few more hurdles and make this
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:47 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> extensions.conf is fully supported in Asterisk 1.6.x; there have been
> some syntax changes (which are covered in the UPGRADE files)
I was able to overcome a few more hurdles and make this work. Little
annoyances such as (after some G
Steve Edwards writes:
> I used to be a "use the source Luke" kind of guy. Now I'm a yum-aholic.
>
> But, when the pain of using packages exceeds the hassle of the source,
> I'll use the source without hesitation.
It isn't that hard to make your own Asterisk RPM's. It's slightly harder
to make y
At 02:27 PM 8/19/2009, you wrote:
>Not at all. I'm just saying if the available packages are "doing it" for
>you, compiling the source is pretty trivial. If the packages "catch up"
>with F11 you can always install them then.
My first experience with Linux and Asterisk was putting a whatever
TrixB
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 03:48:22PM -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> > This appears to be somewhat inconsistent in your determination to
> > update to 1.6. Are packages for 1.4 available for F11?
>
> Well, Axel did just say that he might be providing some through ATrpms,
> so that is a possibility.
Actu
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 14:27 -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
> > When the developers want to convert the config language, sooner or later
> > they will stop supporting the old stuff and it won't be possible to get
> > the newest supported features without converting.
> I don't see that happening in
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Greg Woods wrote:
> When the developers want to convert the config language, sooner or later
> they will stop supporting the old stuff and it won't be possible to get
> the newest supported features without converting. So I don't want to
> fall TOO far behind.
I don't see
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 11:49 -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
> But, when the pain of using packages exceeds the hassle of the source,
> I'll use the source without hesitation.
Agreed. I use trunk for MythTV, for instance, because there are features
not in the latest packaged version that I really do
Greg Woods wrote:
> I heard one person say that extensions.conf should still work in 1.6; is
> that true? Mine seems to be completely ignored. Is there some other
> config file that I need to edit to make this happen? If I could do that,
> I could get the OS switch done and it would buy me some ti
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Greg Woods wrote:
> If at all possible I want to use the standard packaged version as it
> makes security updates much easier.
I used to be a "use the source Luke" kind of guy. Now I'm a yum-aholic.
But, when the pain of using packages exceeds the hassle of the source,
I'l
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 09:56 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> This has got to be an FAQ, so if someone can point me to where it is
> answered, I would be greatly appreciated. The documentation for all this
> stuff is scattered and (to me at least) either very sketchy or hard to
> find.
>
Well at least I'
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 12:25 -0400, Singer X.J. Wang wrote:
>> Can I make a non related suggestions?
>>
>> Ditch Fedora and use CentOS.
>
> Might be a possibility except that this is a catch-all home server. It
> is used for things other than asterisk, so th
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 12:25 -0400, Singer X.J. Wang wrote:
> Can I make a non related suggestions?
>
> Ditch Fedora and use CentOS.
Might be a possibility except that this is a catch-all home server. It
is used for things other than asterisk, so there are other reasons why I
need a more up-to-dat
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> This has got to be an FAQ, so if someone can point me to where it is
> answered, I would be greatly appreciated. The documentation for all this
> stuff is scattered and (to me at least) either very sketchy or hard to
> find.
>
> What I want is a
I'm a 1.2 Luddite, but...
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Greg Woods wrote:
> What I want is a guide for how to convert from 1.4 with zaptel to 1.6
> with dahdi.
If you didn't find it on voip-info.org, please start an article.
> All the recent kernel vulnerabilities are forcing me to upgrade my home
> s
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:56:38AM -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> This has got to be an FAQ, so if someone can point me to where it is
> answered, I would be greatly appreciated. The documentation for all this
> stuff is scattered and (to me at least) either very sketchy or hard to
> find.
>
> Wh
Can I make a non related suggestions?
Ditch Fedora and use CentOS.
Greg Woods wrote:
> This has got to be an FAQ, so if someone can point me to where it is
> answered, I would be greatly appreciated. The documentation for all this
> stuff is scattered and (to me at least) either very sketchy or h
This has got to be an FAQ, so if someone can point me to where it is
answered, I would be greatly appreciated. The documentation for all this
stuff is scattered and (to me at least) either very sketchy or hard to
find.
What I want is a guide for how to convert from 1.4 with zaptel to 1.6
with dahd
18 matches
Mail list logo
