On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 07:50 -0400, Matt wrote:
We still run 1.2.6 on some of our production systems because, so far,
it has been the only stable release of Asterisk for us. Other
versions core dump for no reason and do all kinds of other funky
things.
On 5/29/07, Jaswinder Singh [EMAIL
My specific problem is that Asterisk 1.2.17 and 1.2.18 (I've not tried
1.2.16) core dumps at least once per day. 1.2.15 works just fine for
me. I don't know if there are open bugs. I've not opened any bugs.
Any time I open a bug for a problem I have on a production server, all
people
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Bosch
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 10:30 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] *End Of Life ASTERISK 1.2.X
We still run 1.2.6 on some of our production systems because, so far, it has
been the only stable release of Asterisk for us. Other versions core dump
for no reason and do all kinds of other funky things.
On 5/29/07, Jaswinder Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you say might be true for
I'm running a
1.2.7.something (i think) that has been running almost nonstop since
installing. Very reliable and stable for my needs.
This version has some security issues inside.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
I think its a fair decision . 1.2 is very stable and they are not
closing it all together , security issues will still be fixed . They
need to concentrate more on 1.4 to make it bugfree .
Fair indeed. I would guess that a completely stable 1.2 w/ security
maintenance is acceptable to the
Michael Collins wrote:
I think its a fair decision . 1.2 is very stable and they are not
closing it all together , security issues will still be fixed . They
need to concentrate more on 1.4 to make it bugfree .
Fair indeed. I would guess that a completely stable 1.2 w/ security
maintenance is
Well i guess you just need a good look on logs for why and when you
are getting core dumps . We are having few servers running .1.2.18 and
it has turned out to be most stable in whole 1.2 branch ( had some
issues with 1.2.13 and 14 ) .
Except that for some users 1.2.18 is NOT stable. I've had
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Michael Collins wro
Except that for some users 1.2.18 is NOT stable. I've had to roll
back to 1.2.15 on my production servers in order to prevent core dumps
at least once per day. No, I am not willing to turn my production
servers into testing servers to solve
Hi,
Except that for some users 1.2.18 is NOT stable. I've had to roll back
to 1.2.15 on my production servers in order to prevent core dumps at
least once per day. No, I am not willing to turn my production servers
into testing servers to solve this. Doing so would make me a former
consultant
What you say might be true for small business or home pbx systems .
But if you have a production server handling sip/iax trunks over
internet then you need to upgrade to avoid security related bugs and
exploits that are released .
You seem to miss the idea here. You work with a version
Eric ManxPower Wieling escreveu:
Michael Collins wrote:
Except that for some users 1.2.18 is NOT stable. I've had to roll back
to 1.2.15 on my production servers in order to prevent core dumps at
least once per day. No, I am not willing to turn my production servers
into testing servers to
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:06:54PM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Michael Collins wrote:
I think its a fair decision . 1.2 is very stable and they are not
closing it all together , security issues will still be fixed . They
need to concentrate more on 1.4 to make it bugfree .
Fair
Well if you are out of luck with asterisk .. How about its fork
callweaver ? I am highly awaiting its stable release to see if it
holds upto what its wiki says .
On 30/05/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:06:54PM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Michael
At 16:17 5/29/2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:06:54PM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Michael Collins wrote:
I think its a fair decision . 1.2 is very stable and they are not
closing it all together , security issues will still be fixed . They
need to concentrate
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:35:36AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
Well if you are out of luck with asterisk .. How about its fork
callweaver
Is it not enough that they have forked Asterisk, you now want to fork
from CallWeaver? You're sure after some interesting life ;-)
? I am highly
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:06:54PM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Michael Collins wrote:
I think its a fair decision . 1.2 is very stable and they are not
closing it all together , security issues will still be fixed . They
need to concentrate more on 1.4 to make it
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:06:54PM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Michael Collins wrote:
I think its a fair decision . 1.2 is very stable and they are not
closing it all together , security issues will still be fixed . They
need to concentrate more on 1.4 to make it
18 matches
Mail list logo
