.
Just a thought.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006
10:36 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] 911
versus 9.911
Is there a FCC or other North America
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] 911 versus 9.911
Is there a FCC or other North America requirement that I provide
911 versus 9.911. I want to require users to dial 9.911 in our
office, and remove 911. Are there any statutory requirements or
laws about
I play a recording that starts as soon as the second 1 is pressed:
If this is an emergency, please hang up and dial 9-911.
Short, simple, and to the point.
--
Strom Carlson
http://www.stromcarlson.com/
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
I once worked for a big accounting firm who eliminated this problem very
simply -- they used 7 to get a trunk. 7911 and 911 would still get you
an emergency operator, but accidental 911 calls were all but a thing of
the past.
Aaron Daniel wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 20:10 -0700, George
Is there a FCC or other North America
requirement that I provide 911 versus 9.911. I want to require users to dial
9.911 in our office, and remove 911. Are there any statutory requirements or
laws about this? User accidentially dial 9 then 1 then another 1 and hangup.
Weve
Jason Aarons (US) wrote:
Is there a FCC or other North America requirement that I provide 911
versus 9.911. I want to require users to dial 9.911 in our office, and
remove 911. Are there any statutory requirements or laws about this?
User accidentially dial 9 then 1 then another 1 and
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 20:10 -0700, George Pajari wrote:
I'd rather pay the fine than the liability settlement when found
negligent in a lawsuit because someone panicked, repeatedly dialled 911,
and could not reach Emergency when their coworker had a major myocardial
infarction right beside
