Re: [asterisk-users] AGI <==> DeadAGI

2010-05-02 Thread SIP
On 5/2/2010 4:52 PM, Steve Edwards wrote: > On Sat, 1 May 2010, SIP wrote: > > [snip] > > >> We run DeadAGI for a considerable number of calls since it has the >> ability to run post-hangup cleanup no matter which side hangs up (unlike >> AGI). >> > [snip] > > When a channel hangs up, Ast

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI <==> DeadAGI

2010-05-02 Thread Steve Edwards
On Sat, 1 May 2010, SIP wrote: [snip] > We run DeadAGI for a considerable number of calls since it has the > ability to run post-hangup cleanup no matter which side hangs up (unlike > AGI). [snip] When a channel hangs up, Asterisk sends a SIGHUP signal to the AGI. If the AGI did not establis

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI <==> DeadAGI

2010-05-02 Thread John Novack
CHEN XUEQIN wrote: > Hi Luki: > > 于 2010年05月01日 06:03, Luki 写道: > > >> The good news is, we run tens of thousands of calls every day through >> this box and about half of them spit out this warning, but it never >> caused any problems for over a year. Thus this warning is probably >> safe to i

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI <==> DeadAGI

2010-05-02 Thread Luki
> We run tens of thousands of call every day too. Call is controlled > by AGI , and the asterisk version is 1.2.24. I find memory leak in > asterisk. After serveral weeks, the memory used by asterisk will reach > 1.2 GB or higher. Each time I have to restart to asterisk, and the > memory leak will

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI <==> DeadAGI

2010-05-02 Thread CHEN XUEQIN
Hi Luki: 于 2010年05月01日 06:03, Luki 写道: > The good news is, we run tens of thousands of calls every day through > this box and about half of them spit out this warning, but it never > caused any problems for over a year. Thus this warning is probably > safe to ignore. We run tens of thousands o

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI <==> DeadAGI

2010-05-01 Thread SIP
On 4/30/2010 6:03 PM, Luki wrote: >> It is irrelevant who hangs up, you want to just use DeadAGI in the h >> extension >> > I wish that would be the case, but at least on 1.4 I see: > > [Apr 30 14:59:38] -- Executing [...@master-route:1] DeadAGI(...) in new > stack > [Apr 30 14:59:38] WA

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI <==> DeadAGI

2010-04-30 Thread Luki
> It is irrelevant who hangs up, you want to just use DeadAGI in the h > extension I wish that would be the case, but at least on 1.4 I see: [Apr 30 14:59:38] -- Executing [...@master-route:1] DeadAGI(...) in new stack [Apr 30 14:59:38] WARNING[27845]: res_agi.c:2160 deadagi_exec: Running De

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI <==> DeadAGI

2010-04-29 Thread Ishfaq Malik
Redouane Zerargui wrote: > Hello, i have this problem : > i phone person B . > _/*if i hang up*/_, i have this "h" extension : exten => h,1,AGI(ende.agi) > _/*if the person B hangs up*/_ , i have this "h" extension : exten => > h,1,DeadAGI(ende.agi) > > The problem is, i do not know where hangs

[asterisk-users] AGI <==> DeadAGI

2010-04-29 Thread Redouane Zerargui
Hello, i have this problem : i phone person B . *if i hang up,* i have this "h" extension : exten => h,1,AGI(ende.agi) *if the person B hangs up* , i have this "h" extension : exten => h,1, DeadAGI(ende.agi) The problem is, i do not know where hangs up the first . How kann i combine AGI and DeadA

[asterisk-users] AGI <==> DeadAGI

2010-04-29 Thread Redouane Zerargui
Hello, i have this problem : i phone person B . *if i hang up*, i have this "h" extension : exten => h,1,AGI(ende.agi) *if the person B hangs up* , i have this "h" extension : exten => h,1, DeadAGI(ende.agi) The problem is, i do not know where hangs up the first . How kann i combine AGI and DeadA