On 12/15/09 12:30, VoIP Newbie wrote:
Joseph,
You may want to try RPA-2E1S1O from www.broad-tel.com from China. It
provides real FXO port that registers with Asterisk.
David
Are you using it?
I could not find much information bout it on wiki; besides I think I'll settle
for Audiocodec 114 (not
I'll check it out, but Grandstream HT503 doesn't have a good introduction on
voip-wiki web-page:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/HT-503
--
Joseph
On 12/11/09 19:37, jonas kellens wrote:
Grandstream HT503
Noy a really big problem to configure, but in my case the FXO port always
Joseph,
You may want to try RPA-2E1S1O from www.broad-tel.com from China. It
provides real FXO port that registers with Asterisk.
David
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking for a reliable ATA FXO/FXS adapter.
Linksys 3102 - a lot of echo problem + two
Since you seem to have reservations about all the hardware options
available, how about avoiding the problem altogether? Order remote call
forwarding on your POTS lines and call forward them to DIDs provided by
an ITSP. No FXOs required.
If there's a problem you defeat the call forwarding and
I'm looking for a reliable ATA FXO/FXS adapter.
Linksys 3102 - a lot of echo problem + two of them died within a year (not
reliable)
Sangoma USBFXO - problem installing drive in Gentoo.
I've tried two Chines units: AG-188N and YGW30B
none are of them have real FXO port that will register with
Grandstream HT503
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 10:37 -0700, Joseph wrote:
I'm looking for a reliable ATA FXO/FXS adapter.
Linksys 3102 - a lot of echo problem + two of them died within a year (not
reliable)
Sangoma USBFXO - problem installing drive in Gentoo.
I've tried two Chines units:
I'll check it out, but Grandstream HT503 doesn't have a good introduction on
voip-wiki web-page:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/HT-503
--
Joseph
On 12/11/09 19:37, jonas kellens wrote:
Grandstream HT503
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 10:37 -0700, Joseph wrote:
I'm looking for a reliable ATA
-Original Message-
From: Joseph [mailto:syscon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 11:37 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] ATA FXO
I'm looking for a reliable ATA FXO/FXS adapter.
Linksys 3102 - a lot of echo problem + two of them died within
On 12/11/09 12:52, Connor Spiess wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joseph [mailto:syscon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 11:37 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] ATA FXO
I'm looking for a reliable ATA FXO/FXS adapter.
Linksys 3102 - a lot
-Original Message-
From: Joseph [mailto:syscon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 1:31 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ATA FXO
On 12/11/09 12:52, Connor Spiess wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joseph
On 12/11/09 14:44, Connor Spiess wrote:
Looks very interesting, but they are all either FXS or FXO; it would be
practical if they could make it 2xFX0 and or 2xFXS or modular design.
Cisco had such unit but they discontinued it.
--
Joseph
You could also check out the Audio Codes gateways if the
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Connor Spiess cspi...@idea-ma.com wrote:
Joseph
You could also check out the Audio Codes gateways if the Grandstream doesn't
work out for you. They make FXO/FXS
gateways. They were reliable boxes for us but this was to a non-asterisk PBX
over MGCP. I
On 12/11/09 14:05, Jonathan Thurman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Connor Spiess cspi...@idea-ma.com wrote:
Joseph
You could also check out the Audio Codes gateways if the Grandstream doesn't
work out for you. They make FXO/FXS
gateways. They were reliable boxes for us but this was
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Joseph wrote:
On 12/11/09 14:05, Jonathan Thurman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Connor Spiess cspi...@idea-ma.com wrote:
Joseph
You could also check out the Audio Codes gateways if the Grandstream
doesn't work out for you. They make FXO/FXS
gateways. They
On 12/12/09 04:02, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
[snip]
Thank for suggestion.
Well, it is not that cheap but the problem with their equipment is luck
support and decent manual.
Whatever I google about AudioCodecs everybody seems to be straggling with
the setup; I don't think this should be that
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Thank for suggestion.
Well, it is not that cheap but the problem with their equipment is luck
support and decent manual.
I actually find the Quick-start guide that comes in the box the most
useful, if you aren't doing
On 12/11/09 21:21, Jonathan Thurman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Thank for suggestion.
Well, it is not that cheap but the problem with their equipment is luck
support and decent manual.
I actually find the Quick-start guide that comes in the
Yeah, we're looking to get rid of the asterisk box at that location and do
it easy if possible.
I'm sort of surprised that there are no ATA devices that will forward
incoming calls on the FXO to a SIP or IAX destination. Though maybe our
usage case is different than most.
thanks,
matt
On Fri,
Matthew Gibson wrote:
Yeah, we're looking to get rid of the asterisk box at that location
and do it easy if possible.
I'm sort of surprised that there are no ATA devices that will forward
incoming calls on the FXO to a SIP or IAX destination. Though maybe
our usage case is different than
i can only think of an asterisk box the right dialplan.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Hi All,
Quick question.
We have a customer with a T1 located in their data center, and then one TDM
card for local calls at their remote offices.
We would like to remove the local PBX and TDM card and have them register
directly to the main server.
For the remote office, that still uses one
21 matches
Mail list logo
