[asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-04-29 Thread David Backeberg
I'm considering a situation where I buy about twenty ATA devices. I've played with the Linksys / Cisco PAP2T, and got that working fine with some inbound and outbound faxing. The web GUI was okay. I'm seeing prices around $45 to $50 for this thing. It comes with two FXS ports, but I only need one

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-04-29 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, David Backeberg wrote: > I'm considering a situation where I buy about twenty ATA devices. > > I've played with the Linksys / Cisco PAP2T, and got that working fine > with some inbound and outbound faxing. The web GUI was okay. I'm > seeing prices around $45 to $50 for this t

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-04-29 Thread Dan Journo
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, David Backeberg wrote: > I'm considering a situation where I buy about twenty ATA devices. > > I've played with the Linksys / Cisco PAP2T, and got that working fine > with some inbound and outbound faxing. The web GUI was okay. I'm > seeing prices around $45 to $50 for this th

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-04-29 Thread Dean Hoover
On 4/29/2010 3:10 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, David Backeberg wrote: > >> I'm considering a situation where I buy about twenty ATA devices. >> >> I've played with the Linksys / Cisco PAP2T, and got that working fine >> with some inbound and outbound faxing. The web GUI wa

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-04-29 Thread Jian Gao
Dan Journo wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, David Backeberg wrote: > > >> I'm considering a situation where I buy about twenty ATA devices. >> >> I've played with the Linksys / Cisco PAP2T, and got that working fine >> with some inbound and outbound faxing. The web GUI was okay. I'm >> seeing pri

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-04-29 Thread Geoff Lane
On Thursday, April 29, 2010, David Backeberg wrote: > What do people think about both products? > Bonus points for if people have bulk deployed these, either with TFTP > and configs pushed from a server, or some other good idea. I can't claim the bonus points. However, I did have a couple of Gra

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-04-30 Thread Raimund Sacherer
l - De: "David Backeberg" Para: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Enviados: Jueves, 29 de Abril 2010 21:36:36 Asunto: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286 I'm considering a situation where I buy about tw

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-04-30 Thread Vieri
--- On Fri, 4/30/10, Raimund Sacherer wrote: > Hi, I had to choose between an 8 port > FXS device from Cisco/Linksys (the sipura 3000) and a > similar device from Grandstream. A look on the Grandstream's > forums had me scratching my had, so much people with > problems, frequently needed restart

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-04-30 Thread Steve Howes
On 30 Apr 2010, at 09:41, Vieri wrote: > As far as having an internal fan for cooling, I don't know if that's actually > "better"... In general, these devices shouldn't need to rely on mechanical > cooling which tends to fail in time (sure, you can open the case and replace > it but that's extr

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-04-30 Thread Gareth Blades
In my previous company we bought about 30 Grandstream GXP2000 phones. The build and design quality of those phones were terrible (not to mention firmware bugs). Speakerphone and headset ports were unusable. The external powersupply would only last a year or two before it failed. The screen was so

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-05-01 Thread James Lamanna
>> It seems that the PAP2T does support TFTP and an XML-based config for >> deployments... >> I've used both the Grandstream 286 and the Linksys PAP2T. I have been able to get some limited faxing to work using T30 with a PAP2T. Configuration and provisioning of the Linksys is very easy through eit

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-05-02 Thread Steve Underwood
On 05/02/2010 02:59 AM, James Lamanna wrote: >>> It seems that the PAP2T does support TFTP and an XML-based config for >>> deployments... >>> >>> > I've used both the Grandstream 286 and the Linksys PAP2T. > I have been able to get some limited faxing to work using T30 with a PAP2T. > Confi

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream Handytone 286

2010-05-02 Thread Mark Scholten
sterisk-users] ATA shootout: PAP2T versus Grandstream > Handytone 286 > > >> It seems that the PAP2T does support TFTP and an XML-based config > for > >> deployments... > >> > > I've used both the Grandstream 286 and the Linksys PAP2T. > I have b