On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 06:33:35PM -0400, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
The something is generated by Asterisk at the time the call is
created. You should never add it, since you don't control that call
instance info. In fact, you should almost never care about the call
instance string.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:57:49PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:54:21PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:35:33PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
What's wrong with plain old Zap/NN ?
[test]
exten =
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:09:16AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:52:20PM -0400, Al Baker wrote:
Quote
seems like a dial-by-span syntax.
What is Dial-by-span ?
Zap/span-num-channel-in-span
Hmmm.
Zap/2 here means the second Zap timeslot on the machine, as does
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:14:14PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:09:16AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:52:20PM -0400, Al Baker wrote:
Quote
seems like a dial-by-span syntax.
What is Dial-by-span ?
Zap/span-num-channel-in-span
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:12:42PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:57:49PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:54:21PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:35:33PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
What's wrong with plain old
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 09:34:29PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:12:42PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:57:49PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:54:21PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 09:32:03PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Zap/2 here means the second Zap timeslot on the machine, as does
Zap/2-1, using all PRI's on Digium and Sangoma cards.
I would have *expected* that it might behave the way you suggest, but
it appears not to. Unless it has
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 03:28:10PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 09:34:29PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:12:42PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:57:49PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:38:07PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
[ quoting me ]
Chanunavail/Congestion.
Here, let me go get the exact message...
==88
-- Executing AGI(SIP/101cathy-b7619990,
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 03:32:34PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 09:32:03PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Zap/2 here means the second Zap timeslot on the machine, as does
Zap/2-1, using all PRI's on Digium and Sangoma cards.
I would have *expected* that it might
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 03:46:28PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:38:07PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
[ quoting me ]
Chanunavail/Congestion.
Here, let me go get the exact message...
==88
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:48:54PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Except that that is what Asterisk is giving *us*:
-- Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1 answered Zap/73-1
-- IAX2/VICIast26-19 answered Zap/73-1
-- Zap/11-1 is ringing
-- Zap/11-1 answered SIP/101cathy-0824cda0
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 03:46:28PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:38:07PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
[ quoting me ]
Chanunavail/Congestion.
Here, let me go get the exact message...
The something is generated by Asterisk at the time the call is
created. You should never add it, since you don't control that call
instance info. In fact, you should almost never care about the call
instance string. The -1 means first instance of a call on this
channel, a -2 would be seen
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:35:33PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
What's wrong with plain old Zap/NN ?
[test]
exten = _6XXX.,1,Dial(Zap/{EXTEN:1:3}/${EXTEN:4})
Now call 6chan_numnumber-to-dial in context test.
As it happens, Asterisk 1.2 apparently will not recognize 'Zap/01-1' as
the
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:54:21PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:35:33PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
What's wrong with plain old Zap/NN ?
[test]
exten = _6XXX.,1,Dial(Zap/{EXTEN:1:3}/${EXTEN:4})
Now call 6chan_numnumber-to-dial in context test.
As it
Quote
seems like a dial-by-span syntax.
What is Dial-by-span ?
I have looked and cannot seem to fund that term.
More likely a comment on my ability to find it than on it obscurity
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:54:21PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:52:20PM -0400, Al Baker wrote:
Quote
seems like a dial-by-span syntax.
What is Dial-by-span ?
Zap/span-num-channel-in-span
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:23:44AM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
So I have these 4 new PRIs turning up tomorrow. Anyone have any
suggestions on some dialplan that I could use to allow me to manually
dial calls out over each channel for testing?
I assume I'd have to make a separate group for
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
So I have these 4 new PRIs turning up tomorrow. Anyone have any
suggestions on some dialplan that I could use to allow me to manually
dial calls out over each channel for testing?
I use:
exten = _71NXXNXX,1,Read(ZAPLINE|conf-getchannel)
exten =
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:39:42AM -0400, Doug Lytle wrote:
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
So I have these 4 new PRIs turning up tomorrow. Anyone have any
suggestions on some dialplan that I could use to allow me to manually
dial calls out over each channel for testing?
I use:
exten =
So I have these 4 new PRIs turning up tomorrow. Anyone have any
suggestions on some dialplan that I could use to allow me to manually
dial calls out over each channel for testing?
I assume I'd have to make a separate group for each channel in the
/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf? Or could I just
On Thursday 24 July 2008 10:30:26 Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:39:42AM -0400, Doug Lytle wrote:
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
So I have these 4 new PRIs turning up tomorrow. Anyone have any
suggestions on some dialplan that I could use to allow me to manually
dial calls
23 matches
Mail list logo
