Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-02-01 Thread Grey Man
- Original Message > From: Mindaugas Kezys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Sent: Friday, 1 February, 2008 4:04:30 PM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's > >For

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-02-01 Thread Mindaugas Kezys
-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grey Man Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:35 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's > - Original Message > Fr

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread C F
On Jan 29, 2008 3:54 PM, Grey Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Original Message > > From: C F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 8:05:00 PM > > Subje

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Grey Man
> - Original Message > From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 9:24:14 PM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's > > The

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Grey Man
- Original Message > From: Kevin P. Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 9:34:23 PM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's > > Grey

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Grey Man wrote: > That will work for blind transfers but not attended and even in the blind > transfer case the CDR's still aren't correct you're relying on an > informational field. I think there is an important point being missed here; Asterisk did not originate the concept of CDRs, nor did i

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Benny Amorsen
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Asterisk is doing exactly as it should.. when it steps out of the media > path, the CDR is also dropped, as asterisk is no longer responsible for > that call. Even if Asterisk stays in the media path, the CDR's are dropped. It is an annoying problem. Hopefully

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Matt
> > > Disbaling transfers is an attractive option from my point of view but not > from my customer's. Being able to transfer an incoming call from the > receptionist to the required person is something businesses will consider > changing provider for in my experience. > The provider can disable tr

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Grey Man
- Original Message > From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 8:39:25 PM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's > > Grey...

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Grey Man
- Original Message > From: C F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 8:05:00 PM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's > > Grey, > J

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Matt
> > > > Hi Matt, > > Sadly I understand all to well how transfers work. I've had to go over and > over this for the last 12 months trying to find different ways of handling > it. I'm talking about blind and attended call transfers here not IAX or any > other kind. We are not taking Asterisk out of

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Grey Man
> - Original Message > From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 7:28:32 PM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's > >

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread C F
> > - Original Message > > > From: Richard Revels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 12:21:16 PM > > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Matt
gt; > Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 12:21:16 PM > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's > > > > It's not Asterisk, it's SIP. Transfer takes the signaling off the > > Asterisk box. > > > > In features.conf,

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Grey Man
- Original Message > From: Richard Revels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 12:21:16 PM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's > > I

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Atis Lezdins
On 1/29/08, Richard Revels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not Asterisk, it's SIP. Transfer takes the signaling off the > Asterisk box. > > In features.conf, replace blind transfer with a call to a macro. Then > redo your dialplan with the 'g' option on inward dial commands. When > the called p

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-29 Thread Richard Revels
It's not Asterisk, it's SIP. Transfer takes the signaling off the Asterisk box. In features.conf, replace blind transfer with a call to a macro. Then redo your dialplan with the 'g' option on inward dial commands. When the called party uses the transfer command, your macro should read the

[asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

2008-01-28 Thread Grey Man
Hi All, PLEASE READ if you depend on Asterisk CDR's and support transfers. Apologies for the shout but I'm desperate to get others to agree Asterisk has a big problem with the CDR's that are generated for transfers. I can understand why not too many people are interested as transfers are complica