Hello Steve,
Thank you so much for your response, we are testing each working nodes
separately. These are computers the size of your palm that run on an
average of <10 watts.
With more's law in mind, how far can we push? I just kept the load
under 80% cpu consumptions? Can we increase exponential
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Nick Khamis wrote:
We have a clustered asterisk setup, and it seems like 200 concurrent
calls at 70% cpu is how we can keep these machine humming comfortably.
200 channels on a single 7 year old server running CentOS 4.x and
Asterisk 1.2.x would not be exceptional. I would
Hello Marie,
Increasing the rate got us up 2 folds, Thank you so much for your
help. We have a clustered asterisk setup, and it seems like 200
concurrent calls at 70% cpu is how we can keep these machine humming
comfortably.
Kind Regards,
Nick
On 4/9/13, Marie Fischer wrote:
> On 09.04.2013, a
On 09.04.2013, at 23:43, Nick Khamis wrote:
> That's just it! Nothing! It just does not pass the 91 mark. There are
> no failed calls during the test:
>
> Successful call|0 |20802
> Failed call|0 |0
>
> It's loc
That's just it! Nothing! It just does not pass the 91 mark. There are
no failed calls during the test:
Successful call|0 |20802
Failed call|0 |0
It's locked on 91 calls. I think I have a channel limit or call li
On 13-04-09 02:49 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Everyone,
We are running some torcher tests on our * box using SIPP. The overall idea
of the test is to contact asterisk and play a g729 encoded recording. On
the asterisk side, we are initiating the echo app for the contacted
extension, simulating
Hello Everyone,
We are running some torcher tests on our * box using SIPP. The overall idea
of the test is to contact asterisk and play a g729 encoded recording. On
the asterisk side, we are initiating the echo app for the contacted
extension, simulating a two way conversation.
For some reason we