On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:40:08 -0600, Michael Graves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the major advantages of using voip is that call termination and
DIDs are wholly separate matters. You can send outbound calls to
various ITSPs based on least cost routing, leaving your POTS lines free
to take
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 02:29:13 +0100, Vincent wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:40:08 -0600, Michael Graves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the major advantages of using voip is that call termination and
DIDs are wholly separate matters. You can send outbound calls to
various ITSPs based on least
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:42:49 -0600, Michael Graves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can keep the POTS line but remote call forward to your ITSP.
Yup, but
1) the telco that handles the POTS line charges us for the connection
between our POTS number and the ITSP, with the caller obviously paying
for
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:09:40 +0100, Vincent wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:42:49 -0600, Michael Graves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can keep the POTS line but remote call forward to your ITSP.
Yup, but
1) the telco that handles the POTS line charges us for the connection
between our POTS number
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:34:50 -0600, Michael Graves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I migrated to a Soekris Net4801 and dropped that FXOs completely.
I must say that for me that was a good decision. For about 6 months I
call forwarded my numbers to DID provided by an ITSP. I actually tried
several
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:46:38 +0100, Vincent wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:34:50 -0600, Michael Graves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I migrated to a Soekris Net4801 and dropped that FXOs completely.
I must say that for me that was a good decision. For about 6 months I
call forwarded my numbers to
Hello
I'm looking at my options to build a compact, silent, headless
Asterisk server to handle one or two FXO ports. Out of curiosity, I
got one of those babies on eBay for 20E:
http://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/software/netstation-8364/
Before I spend time on this, can someone tell me
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:51:44 +0100, Vincent wrote:
Hello
I'm looking at my options to build a compact, silent, headless
Asterisk server to handle one or two FXO ports. Out of curiosity, I
got one of those babies on eBay for 20E:
http://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/software/netstation-8364/
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:24:52 -0600, Michael Graves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no reason why that could not work for you. With a 266 MHz CPU
you have a platform roughly comparable to a Soekris Net4801. That means
limited transcoding.
Thanks for the tip on the HP T5700. There's one for sale
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:48:31 +0100, Vincent wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:24:52 -0600, Michael Graves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no reason why that could not work for you. With a 266 MHz CPU
you have a platform roughly comparable to a Soekris Net4801. That means
limited transcoding.
Thanks
10 matches
Mail list logo
