On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 09:24 -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> I beg to differ with you Jared. Since I don't have your email, I'll post
> this here. Create this call file.
Funny... as you copied me on the email...
> On my "test" machine using a TDM400P, the playback would occur in a manner
> such t
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:24:02AM -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> I beg to differ with you Jared. Since I don't have your email, I'll post
> this here. Create this call file.
> Channel: DAHDI/g1/5551212
> CallerID: SIP/104
> MaxRetries: 1
> WaitTime: 60
> retryTime: 5
> Application: playback
> Da
, May 28, 2009 4:34 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best Current Release for Long Term Use
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 14:47 -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> The bug number for #1 is 14935. I developed a similar app that was
working
> great
Clearly the problem is related to option #1. Change confuses some people. :-)It continues to amaze me when I hear this, as there really isn't much
difference between Zaptel and DAHDI. In fact, the only two differences
I know about are:
1) The name change
2) Making software echo can modules abl
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 14:47 -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> The bug number for #1 is 14935. I developed a similar app that was working
> great in the 1.4.21/Zaptel environment, but is now iffy at best in the
> 1.4.25/1.6 environment.
If this is an analog line connected to an FXO port, then Asteris
risk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:22 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best Current Release for Long Term Use
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:32:58PM -0500, Danny
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:32:58PM -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> There are over 100 open items on the Digium board related to DAHDI.
Which is because people use it. I wonder which of those are actually
regressions from before the DAHDI times (not that others are less
serious. But this is what i
.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 1:18 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best Current Release for
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 12:58 -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> This being said, I’d probably go with 1.4.21.X since anything above
> that replaces zaptel with DAHDI. There are still a lot of things “To
> be worked out” in DAHDI – Zaptel is a pretty solid standard.
It continues to amaze me when I h
igium.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Ezell
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:49 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Best Current Release for Long Term Use
It has been suggested that I should do my Asterisk tutorial
(http://qvlweb.blogspot.com/2009/04/aste
It has been suggested that I should do my Asterisk tutorial
(http://qvlweb.blogspot.com/2009/04/asterisk-pbx-install-index.html)
using newer software, OK.
I hope this is not opening a big can of worms, as I am sure there are a
lot of different opinions about this, but:
For a low/no growth co
11 matches
Mail list logo
