Re: [asterisk-users] CDR Rewrite -- Questions to the users (Steve Murphy)

2009-01-12 Thread Steve Murphy
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:08 -0200, David fire wrote: > > > 2009/1/12 Russell Brown > Quoth Steve Murphy... > >Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:51:03 -0700 > > > >QUESTIONS: > > > >Which of the two would you see being useful to you? > > Ob

Re: [asterisk-users] CDR Rewrite -- Questions to the users (Steve Murphy)

2009-01-12 Thread Anthony Francis
David fire wrote: > > > 2009/1/12 Russell Brown mailto:russ...@lls.lls.com>> > > Quoth Steve Murphy... > >Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:51:03 -0700 > > > >QUESTIONS: > > > >Which of the two would you see being useful to you? > > Obvious comment really but given LEG based CDR

Re: [asterisk-users] CDR Rewrite -- Questions to the users (Steve Murphy)

2009-01-12 Thread David fire
2009/1/12 Russell Brown > Quoth Steve Murphy... > >Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:51:03 -0700 > > > >QUESTIONS: > > > >Which of the two would you see being useful to you? > > Obvious comment really but given LEG based CDR, one can determine the > 'Simple' data but you can't work it the other way. > >

Re: [asterisk-users] CDR Rewrite -- Questions to the users (Steve Murphy)

2009-01-12 Thread Russell Brown
Quoth Steve Murphy... >Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:51:03 -0700 > >QUESTIONS: > >Which of the two would you see being useful to you? Obvious comment really but given LEG based CDR, one can determine the 'Simple' data but you can't work it the other way. I'd therefore find LEG based CDR more useful a