On Tuesday 04 August 2009 19:22:20 Hose wrote:
> What you say...Tilghman Lesher (tilgh...@mail.jeffandtilghman.com):
> > It's not exactly clear why it's not in the ChangeLog, but the revision
> > you're speaking of was 194722, and it was merged into 1.6.1 with revision
> > 194724. So yes, it's alre
What you say...Tilghman Lesher (tilgh...@mail.jeffandtilghman.com):
> It's not exactly clear why it's not in the ChangeLog, but the revision you're
> speaking of was 194722, and it was merged into 1.6.1 with revision 194724.
> So yes, it's already there.
>
> --
> Tilghman & Teryl
> with Peter, C
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 16:35:30 Hose wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out which 1.6 releases have the fix I'm looking for
> by reading the ChangeLog for each release, whether it's in the 1.6.0,
> 1.6.1 branches, or an -rc release.
>
> If I look at the latest -rc releases of 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 (which a
I'm trying to figure out which 1.6 releases have the fix I'm looking for
by reading the ChangeLog for each release, whether it's in the 1.6.0,
1.6.1 branches, or an -rc release.
If I look at the latest -rc releases of 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 (which are
1.6.0.11-rc2 and 1.6.1.3-rc1 respectively), will that
