Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-26 Thread Klaus Darilion
Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy schrieb: You have 2 choices to pickup someone's phone with snom's 1: imagine yourself prefix of pickup, let's say 4 exten=4XX,1,Pickup([EMAIL PROTECTED]) so if u call 4 + phone number you will pickup that one. Second you can add pickupgroup=number for each phone

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-26 Thread Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy
Nice, i will search for that. 2008/6/26 Klaus Darilion [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy schrieb: You have 2 choices to pickup someone's phone with snom's 1: imagine yourself prefix of pickup, let's say 4 exten=4XX,1,Pickup([EMAIL PROTECTED]) so if u call 4 + phone number

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Vazquez David
Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy wrote: To see? how? what phone do you use? Snoms imprement that, you got BLINKING and ON state BLINKING=calling or being called ON=on the phone 2008/6/24 Vazquez David [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, I'm trying to implement such a

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Vazquez David
Gordon Henderson wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Vazquez David wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to implement such a scenario where the Chef picks up his phone and his secretary can see that he is busy. Something like blf, I guess. It's like BLF because that's exactly what it's for..

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy
ok, so do you configured you snom phone tu subscribe to monito extension in asterisk ? It is simple to verify: core show hints Snom's behave exactly like you want when blf enabled. 2008/6/25 Vazquez David [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gordon Henderson wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Vazquez David wrote:

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
I use Snoms. I know there's the feature. I just don't know how to use it, and there's so little documentation on the web.. Anyway, with see I meant that the secretary's phone would have one of the function keys on whenever the chef is on the phone (also when he picks it up, right before

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Vazquez David
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: I use Snoms. I know there's the feature. I just don't know how to use it, and there's so little documentation on the web.. Anyway, with see I meant that the secretary's phone would have one of the function keys on whenever the chef is on the phone (also when he

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Vazquez David
Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy wrote: ok, so do you configured you snom phone tu subscribe to monito extension in asterisk ? It is simple to verify: core show hints Snom's behave exactly like you want when blf enabled. 2008/6/25 Vazquez David [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Rob Hillis
Can I assume you're using Asterisk 1.4 and that you've configured your phones as peers? If this is the case, then you need to set limitonpeers to yes and call-limit to some value in sip.conf. Once this has been done, you should find that BLF behaves as you expect. Vazquez David wrote: Hi

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Vazquez David
Rob Hillis wrote: Can I assume you're using Asterisk 1.4 and that you've configured your phones as peers? If this is the case, then you need to set limitonpeers to yes and call-limit to some value in sip.conf. Once this has been done, you should find that BLF behaves as you expect.

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Rob Hillis
Vazquez David wrote: Yes, I'm using 1.4. And I don't really use sip.conf, but have all my phones on users.conf. Should I put limitonpeers and call-limit on the general section of sip.conf? or on each entry in users.conf [general] should be sufficient, so long as having them set as default for

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Vazquez David
Thankyou all! I think I've got it working :-D ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Vazquez David
Though I wonder... The scenario is as follows: I have 4 phones with the following extensions: 11 (SIP/11) 12 (SIP/12) 13 (SIP/13) 15 (SIP/15) Whenever SIP/11 receives a call, it hints the other phones. Is it possible to pick up that call from one of them? The relevant part of my

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-25 Thread Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy
You have 2 choices to pickup someone's phone with snom's 1: imagine yourself prefix of pickup, let's say 4 exten=4XX,1,Pickup([EMAIL PROTECTED]) so if u call 4 + phone number you will pickup that one. Second you can add pickupgroup=number for each phone you want to be in the group, and add a

[asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-24 Thread Vazquez David
Hi all, I'm trying to implement such a scenario where the Chef picks up his phone and his secretary can see that he is busy. Something like blf, I guess. But so far I've only managed to notify the secretary that the chef is receiving a call. I want to do it the other way around though. I'd like

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-24 Thread Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy
To see? how? what phone do you use? Snoms imprement that, you got BLINKING and ON state BLINKING=calling or being called ON=on the phone 2008/6/24 Vazquez David [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, I'm trying to implement such a scenario where the Chef picks up his phone and his secretary can see that

Re: [asterisk-users] Chef-secretary scenario

2008-06-24 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Vazquez David wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to implement such a scenario where the Chef picks up his phone and his secretary can see that he is busy. Something like blf, I guess. It's like BLF because that's exactly what it's for.. But so far I've only managed to notify