Antonio Gómez Soto wrote:
snip
Ok, thank you. One final question:
I see that it's possible to have multiple auth's in an endpoint. For
incoming traffic to be
authenticated, how does pjsip know which auth to consider? By looking at
the From: address
in the SIP header, and matching that up
Hello,
I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip.
Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact.
I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration settings
on a phone.
Suppose I have a phone with two line buttons, for two extension numbers.
Now,
I
Antonio Gómez Soto wrote:
Hello,
Kia ora,
I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip.
Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact.
I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration
settings on a phone.
Have you looked on the wiki[1]? There's
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Antonio Gómez Soto
antonio.gomez.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip.
Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact.
I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration settings
Thanks for responding,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:45 PM, George Joseph george.jos...@fairview5.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Antonio Gómez Soto
antonio.gomez.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip.
Especially the new
Antonio Gómez Soto wrote:
So basically, the 'contact' in the AOR is just an ip address (or
'dynamic', in which case it accepts
incoming registrations).
A contact is a SIP term, it's a way of getting to something. (IP
address+port)
So what happens if one endpoint has multiple AOR's which
Joshua,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
[..snip..]
Also I notice, an AOR does seem do be directly correlated with an auth
record, so why are
they separate in the configuration, why not unify the aor and the auth
objects?
They aren't at all. Auth =
Antonio Gómez Soto wrote:
snip
I did not mean they are the same, I meant that there seems to be a
one-to-one relationship.
So I am wondering, since the auth does seem useless without an aor, but
an aor
can exist without an auth, why was the auth object created in the first
place,
instead of
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
Antonio Gómez Soto wrote:
snip
I did not mean they are the same, I meant that there seems to be a
one-to-one relationship.
So I am wondering, since the auth does seem useless without an aor, but
an aor
can exist
