BTW, I believe after all said everyone agrees that non of the
providers send onto the PSTN more than 10 digits the only question is
what they send to their customers.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:35 AM, John Novack
wrote:
>
>
> C F wrote:
>>
>> The correct way in the US is to send NPANXX without
C F wrote:
> The correct way in the US is to send NPANXX without the 1, in fact
> AT&T used to display unknown if 11 digit was received.
>
Agreed.
> Vonage decided to add the 1 so that their fancy stupid boxes can dial
> back directly from the box. Sorry for the rant but it has created me
The correct way in the US is to send NPANXX without the 1, in fact
AT&T used to display unknown if 11 digit was received.
Vonage decided to add the 1 so that their fancy stupid boxes can dial
back directly from the box. Sorry for the rant but it has created me
more headaches that I care to reme
Matt wrote:
>I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as:
>NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX-
>My question is: what is the correct way to send Caller-ID by set
standards?
The correct answer to this depends on where you are.
IMO the answer would
On Monday 09 August 2010 14:03:36 Matt wrote:
> I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as:
> NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX-
>
> My question is: what is the correct way to send Caller-ID by set standards?
Given that you can only send CallerID on a digital circuit, it's go
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID
>I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as:
>NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX-
>My question i
>
>
>
>
> >I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as:
> >NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX-
>
> >My question is: what is the correct way to send Caller-ID by set
> standards?
>
>
>
> The correct answer to this depends on where you are.
>
>
> IMO the answer would be #2, but #3
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID
>>Continental US-48.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digi
Continental US-48.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
> asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt
> *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID
>
>
>
> >I've see
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Subject: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID
>I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as:
>NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX-
>My question i
I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as:
NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX-
My question is: what is the correct way to send Caller-ID by set standards?
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://
11 matches
Mail list logo