Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-11 Thread C F
BTW, I believe after all said everyone agrees that non of the providers send onto the PSTN more than 10 digits the only question is what they send to their customers. On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:35 AM, John Novack wrote: > > > C F wrote: >> >> The correct way in the US is to send NPANXX without

Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-10 Thread John Novack
C F wrote: > The correct way in the US is to send NPANXX without the 1, in fact > AT&T used to display unknown if 11 digit was received. > Agreed. > Vonage decided to add the 1 so that their fancy stupid boxes can dial > back directly from the box. Sorry for the rant but it has created me

Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-10 Thread C F
The correct way in the US is to send NPANXX without the 1, in fact AT&T used to display unknown if 11 digit was received. Vonage decided to add the 1 so that their fancy stupid boxes can dial back directly from the box. Sorry for the rant but it has created me more headaches that I care to reme

Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-09 Thread John Novack
Matt wrote: >I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as: >NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX- >My question is: what is the correct way to send Caller-ID by set standards? The correct answer to this depends on where you are. IMO the answer would

Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-09 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Monday 09 August 2010 14:03:36 Matt wrote: > I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as: > NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX- > > My question is: what is the correct way to send Caller-ID by set standards? Given that you can only send CallerID on a digital circuit, it's go

Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-09 Thread Danny Nicholas
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID >I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as: >NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX- >My question i

Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-09 Thread Matt
> > > > > >I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as: > >NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX- > > >My question is: what is the correct way to send Caller-ID by set > standards? > > > > The correct answer to this depends on where you are. > > > IMO the answer would be #2, but #3

Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-09 Thread Danny Nicholas
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID >>Continental US-48. On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digi

Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-09 Thread Matt
Continental US-48. On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: > *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: > asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt > *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID > > > > >I've see

Re: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-09 Thread Danny Nicholas
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Subject: [asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID >I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as: >NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX- >My question i

[asterisk-users] Correct Caller-ID

2010-08-09 Thread Matt
I've seen caller-id come through from carriers as: NPA-NXX-, 1-NPA-NXX-, and +1-NPA-NXX- My question is: what is the correct way to send Caller-ID by set standards? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://