> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:25:50 -0800
> From: bilmar...@yahoo.com
> Subject: RE: Credit Card processing machines
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; listas_quij...@hotmail.com
>
> Why not Asterisk?
> And if need to use RS232, then ethernet is not possible? So how u will use
> AGI with
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> So how u will use AGI with RS232?
While an AGI can "talk" to /dev/ttySx, it would make more sense to write a
daemon to manage the conversations and then your AGIs could talk to the
daemon over TCP, shared memory, pipes, two cans and some string...
Th
Why not Asterisk?
And if need to use RS232, then ethernet is not possible? So how u will use AGI
with RS232?
Regards
Bilal
--- On Thu, 2/19/09, Edwin Quijada wrote:
> From: Edwin Quijada
> Subject: RE: Credit Card processing machines
> To: bilmar...@yahoo.com, "Asterisk Asterisk"
> Date: T
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:50:18 -0800
> From: bilmar...@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: Credit Card processing machines
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> CC: listas_quij...@hotmail.com
>
> And is there a bank accept to give such kind of communication?
>
> The user was able to dial his card
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:50, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> And is there a bank accept to give such kind of communication?
>
> The user was able to dial his card number and the amount from his phone (or
> IP Phone registered with Asterisk), and Asterisk communicate with the bank or
> company credit ca
Ideally the person needs to enter the credit card number, expiration date in
mmyy format (which is the format in which the expiration date is shown on
the card), and the ccv number. The amount would probably be calculated on
the basis of the outstanding amounts, or the products selected. Think of
And is there a bank accept to give such kind of communication?
The user was able to dial his card number and the amount from his phone (or IP
Phone registered with Asterisk), and Asterisk communicate with the bank or
company credit card provider?
How the user will enter $50.25?
What about expir
>
> Our creditcard company's small print _insists_ on a direct analog
> exchange line
> with no other devices in between.
>
> Tim.
>
> Tim Panton - Web/VoIP consultant and implementor
> www.westhawk.co.uk
>
You can do it an interface using AGI to comunicate with equipment or verifone.
I
You shoudl start with your bank. They can probably provide the equipment.
j
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> Really once I read credit card, I got to become interested to know whatis
> exactly happenning.
>
> I am looking to have the possibility to pay to the bank using the VoIP
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:02:28AM +, Tim Panton wrote:
> Our creditcard company's small print _insists_ on a direct analog
> exchange line with no other devices in between.
Wow. You have a direct copper wire to their credit card processing
system? :-)
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq
On 17 Feb 2009, at 19:20, David Gibbons wrote:
We will be testing the ADT connection heavily this week. The modem
connections to my understanding are 2400 baud. Over G.711U and a T1 I
don't see why this wouldn't be as solid as a POTS line, but our
tests will
tell!
We do *fax* in this wa
Really once I read credit card, I got to become interested to know whatis
exactly happenning.
I am looking to have the possibility to pay to the bank using the VoIP adaptor
or IP Telephony, by entering the credit card digits and the password and the
amound.
I do not know if u can help me in th
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jonn Taylor wrote:
>
>
>> If you are in the US, ANY life safety system has to be connected to a
>> dedicated copper POTS line. VOIP is NOT ok to use for this. It is in the
>> NFPA.
>>
>>
>
> What is the NFPA? Do analog extensions in traditio
National fire protection association
They write the fire codes.
http://www.nfpa.org
On 2/17/09 1:28 PM, "Jeff LaCoursiere" wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jonn Taylor wrote:
> If you are in the US, ANY life safety system has to be connected to a
> dedicated copper POTS line. VOIP is NOT ok to
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jonn Taylor wrote:
> If you are in the US, ANY life safety system has to be connected to a
> dedicated copper POTS line. VOIP is NOT ok to use for this. It is in the
> NFPA.
>
What is the NFPA? Do analog extensions in traditional PBXes count?
j
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Most alarm systems around here use bursts of dtmf - not an actual
>>> modem to communicate with alarm central.
>>>
>>> Yes I have seen these have many issues with voip in the path.
>>>
>>
>> You mean they communicate with an IVR? Seems like t
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jerry Jones wrote:
Most alarm systems around here use bursts of dtmf - not an actual
modem to communicate with alarm central.
Yes I have seen these have many issues with voip in the path.
You mean they communicate with an IVR? Seems like
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 15:09, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jerry Jones wrote:
>
>>
>> Most alarm systems around here use bursts of dtmf - not an actual
>> modem to communicate with alarm central.
>>
>> Yes I have seen these have many issues with voip in the path.
>>
>
> You
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jerry Jones wrote:
>
> Most alarm systems around here use bursts of dtmf - not an actual
> modem to communicate with alarm central.
>
> Yes I have seen these have many issues with voip in the path.
>
You mean they communicate with an IVR? Seems like that could be made
sol
On Feb 17, 2009, at 1:20 PM, David Gibbons wrote:
>
> We will be testing the ADT connection heavily this week. The modem
> connections to my understanding are 2400 baud. Over G.711U and a T1 I
> don't see why this wouldn't be as solid as a POTS line, but our
> tests will
> tell!
>
>
> We do
We will be testing the ADT connection heavily this week. The modem
connections to my understanding are 2400 baud. Over G.711U and a T1 I
don't see why this wouldn't be as solid as a POTS line, but our tests will
tell!
We do *fax* in this way and it works like a charm. We can hit much more than
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jon Pounder wrote:
>> Yes -- our alarm monitoring company considers T1 -> * -> ATA -> Alarm
>> to be so unreliable that they require you to sign a waiver
>> (indemnifying them in the event of basically anything) if you hook it
>> up this way. Because of that we kept a POT
David Gibbons wrote:
>
> Certainly a sobering thought. Have others had to deal with this in PBX
> replacement scenarios? Its a giant cost savings in this case - they are
> dropping about 12 POTS lines in favor of utilizing (an underutilized) T1
> trunk that was already in place.
>
>
> Yes -- ou
Certainly a sobering thought. Have others had to deal with this in PBX
replacement scenarios? Its a giant cost savings in this case - they are
dropping about 12 POTS lines in favor of utilizing (an underutilized) T1
trunk that was already in place.
Yes -- our alarm monitoring company considers
Certainly a sobering thought. Have others had to deal with this in PBX
replacement scenarios? Its a giant cost savings in this case - they are
dropping about 12 POTS lines in favor of utilizing (an underutilized) T1
trunk that was already in place.
j
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Don E. Wisdom wrote
The ADT alarm going thru VoIP will create a life safety issue. Hope you
planned for that..
--Don
On 2/17/09 6:31 AM, "Jeff LaCoursiere" wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 17:11, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>>
>> Anyone have much luck with these on A
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 17:11, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>>
>> Anyone have much luck with these on ATA's? I have a few sites that use
>> them succesfully with multi-port Audiocodes boxes, but just connected ten
>> machines to Linksys 2102s and they a
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 17:11, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>
> Anyone have much luck with these on ATA's? I have a few sites that use
> them succesfully with multi-port Audiocodes boxes, but just connected ten
> machines to Linksys 2102s and they are very flaky. Using u-law on a 100Mb
> switched netw
On 7/02/2009 11:54 a.m., Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
> A bit of hopefully happy news - the Linksys 2102 has a feature called
> "modem pass through mode" which can be accessed by prepending *99 to the
> call. Anyone ever used this? Sounds like that might help with faxing as
> well...
Not tried, bu
A bit of hopefully happy news - the Linksys 2102 has a feature called
"modem pass through mode" which can be accessed by prepending *99 to the
call. Anyone ever used this? Sounds like that might help with faxing as
well...
j
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>
> Anyone have much
Anyone have much luck with these on ATA's? I have a few sites that use
them succesfully with multi-port Audiocodes boxes, but just connected ten
machines to Linksys 2102s and they are very flaky. Using u-law on a 100Mb
switched network that is barely utilized, then out a T1 on a Sangoma card.
31 matches
Mail list logo
