Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

Tobias Wolf wrote: > Sure, here you are: > > See Attachment ... Well, that looks perfectly normal. I'm not sure what to tell you, other than that your system might be configured (via klogd) to suppress NOTICE-level kernel messages after boot time or something like that. If you are comfortable ed

Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

Kevin P. Fleming schrieb: Tobias Wolf wrote: I am absolutly positive that DAHDI was not built with NO_ECHOCAN_DISABLE, since i have only downloaded the package and done a 'make; make install' without touching anything of the source code. By the way, i am using DAHDI-linux 2.1.0.3.

Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

Tobias Wolf wrote: > I am absolutly positive that DAHDI was not built with NO_ECHOCAN_DISABLE, > since > i have only downloaded the package and done a 'make; make install' without > touching anything of the source code. > > By the way, i am using DAHDI-linux 2.1.0.3. Can you post your /etc/da

Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

Kevin P. Fleming schrieb: > Tobias Wolf wrote: > >> Does this only take place if fax detection is enabled in DAHDI or is it >> something that happens everytime a CED tone is send over the line? > > FAX detection is not done in DAHDI, it's done in chan_dahdi (in > Asterisk). CED detection is done

Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

Tobias Wolf wrote: > Does this only take place if fax detection is enabled in DAHDI or is it > something that happens everytime a CED tone is send over the line? FAX detection is not done in DAHDI, it's done in chan_dahdi (in Asterisk). CED detection is done in the echo canceler itself, so it is

Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

Hi Kevin, Kevin P. Fleming schrieb: > Tobias Wolf wrote: > >> If it is not possible, why is that so ? Is there really no need to do this >> and i >> am totally mistaken? > > This is generally true. Any standards-compliant FAX machine or modem > will generate a CED tone during the beginning of

Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

Tobias Wolf wrote: > If it is not possible, why is that so ? Is there really no need to do this > and i > am totally mistaken? This is generally true. Any standards-compliant FAX machine or modem will generate a CED tone during the beginning of the call process, and any standards compliant echo

Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

Hello, just want to bring this question up again. Is someone able to tell me, yes you can disable echo can on a per call basis and it is done this way, or not it is not possible, go away ... If it is not possible, why is that so ? Is there really no need to do this and i am totally mistaken?

Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

Olivier schrieb: > > > 2009/2/10 Tobias Wolf > > > Hello all, > > i was just made aware on the Bristuff-Mailing list, that it is > possible to > disable echo cancellation per dialplan application. > > This comes in very handy, for terminating

Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

2009/2/10 Tobias Wolf > Hello all, > > i was just made aware on the Bristuff-Mailing list, that it is possible to > disable echo cancellation per dialplan application. > > This comes in very handy, for terminating faxes. > > But the application seems only to be existing in the bristuff patches. >

[asterisk-users] Disabling Echo Cancellation on a per Call basis

Hello all, i was just made aware on the Bristuff-Mailing list, that it is possible to disable echo cancellation per dialplan application. This comes in very handy, for terminating faxes. But the application seems only to be existing in the bristuff patches. Does there exist a solution for Ast