Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-08 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
assistance! I apprecaite it very much! ++Amaru --- On Mon, 9/8/08, Eric "ManxPower" Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Eric "ManxPower" Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-08 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
How does that look? Thanks for your response! ++Amaru --- On Fri, 9/5/08, Bryce Chidester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Bryce Chidester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Comme

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-08 Thread Jeremy Mann
context from-pri { _8505 => { Wait(1); Answer(); SetTransferCapability(3K1AUDIO); Set(GROUP(ZAP)=incoming); Set(CDR(accountcode)=fax); Set(CDR(userfield)=bedford); Dial(Zap/25/${E

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-08 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:54:12AM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote: > On a PRI calls come in on ANY B-channel. Therefore you cannot just > disable EC on the Fax channels, because there are no dedicated channels > for fax. On a Channelized T-1 you can dedicate channels for fax or any > othe

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-08 Thread Eric "ManxPower" Wieling
practical for a PRI then? >> >> Thank you!!! >> >> ++Amaru >> >> --- On Fri, 9/5/08, Eric "ManxPower" Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> From: Eric "ManxPower" Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [asterisk-

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-08 Thread Steve Totaro
; Thank you!!! > > ++Amaru > > --- On Fri, 9/5/08, Eric "ManxPower" Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Eric "ManxPower" Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Asterisk U

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-08 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
Eric, So what is practical for a PRI then? Thank you!!! ++Amaru --- On Fri, 9/5/08, Eric "ManxPower" Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Eric "ManxPower" Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-05 Thread Eric "ManxPower" Wieling
lt;111> > channel => 25 > > Thanks for your assistance everyone! > > > > --- On Fri, 9/5/08, Bob Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Bob Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question > To: &qu

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-05 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
te: From: Bob Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Date: Friday, September 5, 2008, 4:43 PM On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0700, Amaru Netapshaak wrote: > I have a Sangoma A104d T1 ca

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-05 Thread Vinícius Fontes
I'm having problems exactly with that tone detection. I even submitted a bug report (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13286) but it still has not been viewed yet, I guess. Atenciosamente, Vinícius Fontes Núcleo de Tecnologias Convergentes Canall Tecnologia em Comunicações Passo Fundo - RS

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-05 Thread Alex Balashov
Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: > If I am not mistaken every single echo canceler out there will disable > itself if it detects a fax tone. > > Echo Cancelers do not screw up faxes, people screw up faxes. 8-) Never underestimate how ghetto an echo canceller can be. :-) -- Alex Balashov Evari

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-05 Thread Steve Totaro
I would not bother with fax detection with fax DIDs and on T1s/PRIs. The fewer the modules that you need to rely on and load, the better. Thanks, Steve Totaro 1.888.777.1888 On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Eric ManxPower Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I am not mistaken every single echo

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-05 Thread Eric "ManxPower" Wieling
If I am not mistaken every single echo canceler out there will disable itself if it detects a fax tone. Echo Cancelers do not screw up faxes, people screw up faxes. 8-) Bob Pierce wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0700, Amaru Netapshaak wrote: >> I have a Sangoma A104d T1 card, a Rhino 24-po

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-05 Thread Tim Nelson
Yep... your A104d has HWEC onboard (as signified by the 'd' on your model). It is necessary to set echocancel=no and probably echocancelwhenbridged=no in your zapata.conf to get reliable faxing to work. Tim Nelson Systems/Network Engineer Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105 - "Bob Pierce" <[

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-05 Thread Steve Totaro
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Bob Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0700, Amaru Netapshaak wrote: >> I have a Sangoma A104d T1 card, a Rhino 24-port FXS box, and am >> running >> Asterisk 1.4.21.2 > > I think you're mostly right on this setup, but I wonder if you

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-05 Thread Bob Pierce
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0700, Amaru Netapshaak wrote: > I have a Sangoma A104d T1 card, a Rhino 24-port FXS box, and am > running > Asterisk 1.4.21.2 I think you're mostly right on this setup, but I wonder if your A104d is doing some hardware echo cancellation on these calls. If I'm not mis

[asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question

2008-09-05 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
Hello, I have a Sangoma A104d T1 card, a Rhino 24-port FXS box, and am running Asterisk 1.4.21.2 FAXing works, but not so reliably. I'm wondering what I might have to do in order to make this work. I have my FAX machines connected to individial FXS ports on my Rhino FXS channel bank, and that