Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2009-01-16 Thread Philipp Kempgen
David @ULC schrieb: > Jan 15 17:18:43 ERROR[2636]: chan_sip.c:11355 handle_request: Missing Cseq. > Dropping this SIP message, it's incomplete. This is the important part. One of your phones or FWD or IPCall does not speak SIP properly. Philipp Kempgen -- AMOOCON 2009, May 4-5, Rostock / G

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2009-01-16 Thread David @ULC
I am using Asterisk and IPKall. I tried exactly below mentioned configuration . http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2008-January/203607

[asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2009-01-13 Thread David @ULC
I tried this http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2008-January/203615.html But I am NOT getting call in asterisk. SIP.conf file : _ [general] port = 5060 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 context = default externhost=59.160.44.21 localnet=192.168.0.2/255.255.255.0 ; register SIP ac

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 20:47 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall > > It works! It works! It works! > > I am able to talk to myself. Now all I have to do is write my > dialplan... > &

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Huw Richards
D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane D Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 20:47 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall It works! It works! It works! I am able to talk to myself. Now all I have to do is write my dialplan... Say, wo

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Huw Richards
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Riddell Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 20:51 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Huw Richards wrote: > You're right that dyndn

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Huw Richards wrote: > You're right that dyndns.org offers the same type of services as > no-ip.org. > > However, when I first setup ipkall forwarding directly to my asterisk > server (about a year ago), it would not work with a dyndns.org account - >

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
It works! It works! It works! I am able to talk to myself. Now all I have to do is write my dialplan... Say, would I have to use the [ipkallnumber] extention? Could I specify the "s" extension instead to catch multiple numbers? -- -Shane Blog: http://blind-geek.com/blog/ CoOwner: http://sjtechz

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Huw Richards
27;t tried it in over a year. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Riddell Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 20:11 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall -BEGIN PGP SIGN

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
Change this value to the > hostname you setup at no-ip.org. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane D > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 20:03 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subjec

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Huw Richards
(or something similar). Change this value to the hostname you setup at no-ip.org. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane D Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 20:03 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asteri

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
t; reload" followed by "dialplan reload" (asterisk 1.4) or "extensions > > > reload" (asterisk 1.2). "sip reload" will re-read the sip.conf file & > > > "dialplan reload"/"extensions reload" will re-read the extensions.c

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shane D wrote: > no-ip.org appears to want to charge me money... Is there a free alternative? Dyndns.org - -- Kind Regards, Matt Riddell Director ___ http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
terisk 1.2). "sip reload" will re-read the sip.conf file & > > "dialplan reload"/"extensions reload" will re-read the extensions.conf > > file. > > > > Phone your ipkall number and see if anything is displayed on the console > > and

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Huw Richards
console when you phone, try "sip set debug peer > ipkall.com" (asterisk 1.4 - not sure of the command for asterisk 1.2) > and phone again. > > Post back your results. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
you phone, try "sip set debug peer > ipkall.com" (asterisk 1.4 - not sure of the command for asterisk 1.2) > and phone again. > > Post back your results. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [m

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Huw Richards
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane D Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 17:32 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall Okay... That was kind of confusing. Would you contact me off-list to help me specifically? I've double-check

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huw Richards > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 1:55 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall > > My config is as follows > > Excerpt of s

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
ound IAX2 connections to fwd to be unreliable. Other people may have > > different results. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane D > > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 10:17 > > To: asterisk-u

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread www.IPKall.com
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall My config is as follows Excerpt of sip.conf: [general] externhost=fully.qualified.domain.name localnet=192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 srvlookup=no defaultexpiry=3600 dtmfmode=rfc2833 register

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Huw Richards
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane D Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 12:09 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall It's Iax2. Is there a way of using amore reliable sip connectoin/something slightly different

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Troy Ayers
192.246.x.x =! 192.168.x.x if that is what you're thinking. Anyway, "registration Refused" sounds like you're getting up to FWD and attempting to authenticate, but failing at that point. double-check your iax.conf settings against the FWD "Extra Features" settings... of course make sure IAX is

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
Ignore the part about 192... That happens to be the IP of iax2.fwdnet.net. If anyone has set up FWD successfully for incoming only, let me know. On 1/7/08, Shane D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get the following output: > > Jan 7 10:56:22 NOTICE[4666]: chan_iax2.c:7536 socket_read: > Registrati

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
I get the following output: Jan 7 10:56:22 NOTICE[4666]: chan_iax2.c:7536 socket_read: Registration of '886036' rejected: 'Registration Refused' from: '192.246.69.186' It shouldn't be trying to do something on my network (192) should it? On 1/7/08, Shane D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I will tr

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
I will try that when I return home in about two hours. I'll let you know. On 1/7/08, Benchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have a problem. I have tried everything that is in the book "The > > > Future of Telephony" as well as on the FWD (freeworlddialup) website, > > > and there is still a pr

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Benchev
> > I have a problem. I have tried everything that is in the book "The > > Future of Telephony" as well as on the FWD (freeworlddialup) website, > > and there is still a problem. My asterisk box is not able to associate > > with the FWD server. I get: > > Registration Rejected by [insert IP], and I

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
nnections to fwd to be unreliable. Other people may have > different results. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane D > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 10:17 > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-u

Re: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Huw Richards
17 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall Hello All, I have a problem. I have tried everything that is in the book "The Future of Telephony" as well as on the FWD (freeworlddialup) website, and there is still a problem. My asterisk box is not able to

[asterisk-users] FWD and IPCall

2008-01-07 Thread Shane D
Hello All, I have a problem. I have tried everything that is in the book "The Future of Telephony" as well as on the FWD (freeworlddialup) website, and there is still a problem. My asterisk box is not able to associate with the FWD server. I get: Registration Rejected by [insert IP], and I can't u