On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:04 AM, George Joseph
george.jos...@fairview5.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Paul Belanger
paul.belan...@polybeacon.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Olivier oza.4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
How does extensions.lua compares to
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:04 AM, George Joseph
george.jos...@fairview5.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Paul Belanger
paul.belan...@polybeacon.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:50 PM,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Olivier wrote:
How does extensions.lua compares to extensions.conf or extensions.ael on
stability, performance and features ?
I'm a 1.2 Luddite, but...
I used AEL for a system a couple of years ago.
Even suffering through some syntactical inconsistencies and parsing
, February 13, 2014 8:34 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] How does extensions.lua compares to
extensions.conf ?
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Olivier wrote:
How does extensions.lua compares to extensions.conf or extensions.ael
on stability
Hello,
How does extensions.lua compares to extensions.conf or extensions.ael on
stability, performance and features ?
Would you recommand extensions.lua as an easy/easier way to access
memcached, redis or equivalent ?
Thoughs ? Comments ?
Regards
--
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Olivier oza.4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
How does extensions.lua compares to extensions.conf or extensions.ael on
stability, performance and features ?
Would you recommand extensions.lua as an easy/easier way to access
memcached, redis or equivalent ?
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Olivier oza.4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
How does extensions.lua compares to extensions.conf or extensions.ael on
stability, performance and features ?
Would you
