On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:56:25 +0200, Zoa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are many, (i'm one of the people working for zoiper):
In that case, I think it'd be useful to add a forum on the site, so
people can post when they have problems with the software :-)
Look at the iaxclient homepage,
Thanks
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:52:59 +0100, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have used SIP and IAX for about three years now. We don't do a lot
of traffic, but I haven't really seen a difference in quality or
dropped calls.
Sorry for jumping in, but besides ZoIPer/Idefisk, are there
IAX-capable
There are many, (i'm one of the people working for zoiper):
Look at the iaxclient homepage,
There are iaxcomm, loudhush, kiax, mediax , diax and many more,
(you could also easily make your own).
Cheers,
Zoa
Vincent wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:52:59 +0100, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ouch. Why do they almost all feel they have to use 'IAX' in their title?
Pain. While not half as bad, it's somewhat reminiscent of the iJunk
everyone seems to sell to capitalise on the iPhone phenomenon.
N.
Zoa wrote:
There are many, (i'm one of the people working for zoiper):
Look at the
Daryl G. Jurbala wrote:
How recent? I tried switching from 1.2 to 1.4 about 4 months ago, and
asterisk would stop accepting IAX connections in less than a day and
would need to be restarted.
Just look at the changelogs, there have been lots and lots and lots of
commits to the iax
On Friday 30 November 2007 04:17:36 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
With SIP you can attach custom variables to calls (using
X-... headers).
IAX (Inter-Asterisk eXchange!) can't do that (yet).
With IAX2 you can share variables too. I believe Tilghman had supplied a
patch to do exactly that several
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Friday 30 November 2007 04:17:36 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
With SIP you can attach custom variables to calls (using
X-... headers).
IAX (Inter-Asterisk eXchange!) can't do that (yet).
With IAX2 you can share variables too. I believe Tilghman had supplied a
patch
Daryl G. Jurbala wrote:
How recent? I tried switching from 1.2 to 1.4 about 4 months ago, and
asterisk would stop accepting IAX connections in less than a day and
would need to be restarted.
It has been a continuously worked on task (ever since a few months ago).
Russell Bryant and
Griefs?
rejected connect attempt from 111.111.111.111, who was trying to reach
'12345678' No authority found
call rejected by 111.111.111.111: No authority found
But once it works it works...
I have DTMF issues with sending calls from 1.2 to what I suspect is a
really old 1.4 build via IAX that
How recent? I tried switching from 1.2 to 1.4 about 4 months ago, and
asterisk would stop accepting IAX connections in less than a day and
would need to be restarted.
This is with about 50 to 100 calls at a time on each box for about 10
or 12 hours a day. Less for the other half. And all
IAX had some stability issues in the past, the recent releases have a
lot of iax2 fixes and should no longer have those issues.
Zoa
Steve Totaro wrote:
randulo wrote:
Hi,
We all know what the principal advantage of IAX is, doing it all on a
single port, right? But now and again I
randulo wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 1:40 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
solved these issues. I think trunking (one of the main selling points
of IAX due to less overhead) may be a common denominator.
That does tend to explain why I've never experienced (or at least
noticed) problems.
On Nov 30, 2007 1:40 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
solved these issues. I think trunking (one of the main selling points
of IAX due to less overhead) may be a common denominator.
That does tend to explain why I've never experienced (or at least
noticed) problems. I never trunk
randulo wrote:
Hi,
We all know what the principal advantage of IAX is, doing it all on a
single port, right? But now and again I hear complaints about it. What
specific griefs have you had with IAX and has it stopped you from
using it entirely? Under what conditions have you had problems?
randulo wrote:
What
specific griefs have you had with IAX and has it stopped you from
using it entirely?
With SIP you can attach custom variables to calls (using
X-... headers).
IAX (Inter-Asterisk eXchange!) can't do that (yet).
Regards,
Philipp Kempgen
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 -
Hi,
We all know what the principal advantage of IAX is, doing it all on a
single port, right? But now and again I hear complaints about it. What
specific griefs have you had with IAX and has it stopped you from
using it entirely? Under what conditions have you had problems?
I have used SIP and
30, 2007 8:09 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] IAX complaints? What are they?
On Nov 30, 2007 1:40 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
solved these issues. I think trunking (one of the main selling points
of IAX due to less
The jitter buffer is actually the same.
Zoa
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
randulo wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 1:40 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
solved these issues. I think trunking (one of the main selling points
of IAX due to less overhead) may be a common
18 matches
Mail list logo
