On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:10, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:00:38AM +, Gordon Henderson wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Doug wrote:
>
>> Interesting shopping list - I've just built a new server for my co-lo and
>> it's an Intel Atom mobo. Normally I do use AMD though, but r
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:00:38AM +, Gordon Henderson wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Doug wrote:
>
>> Interesting shopping list - I've just built a new server for my co-lo and
>> it's an Intel Atom mobo. Normally I do use AMD though, but right now,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:00:38AM +, Gordon Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Doug wrote:
> Interesting shopping list - I've just built a new server for my co-lo and
> it's an Intel Atom mobo. Normally I do use AMD though, but right now,
> power consumption is an issue and hen AMD's l
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Doug wrote:
> This would work:
> ~~
> Codegen case:
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811182566
>
> Thermaltake power supply:
> http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec_v2.asp?scriteria=BA23480
>
> Motherboar
Doug wrote:
> At 12:33 2/22/2009, michel freiha wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP
>> calls...My next step is to choose the best hardware that I should
>> use i order to have the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices
>> for my hardware (CPU)..
At 12:33 2/22/2009, michel freiha wrote:
>Hi all,
>I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP
>calls...My next step is to choose the best hardware that I should
>use i order to have the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices
>for my hardware (CPU)...
>1- Using Intel CPU or
what is "asterisk IMO"?
Asterisk, I think you know.
IMO is a common E-Mail/Newsgroup abbreviation that means In My Opinion--similar
to another one IMHO (Humble).
Wilton
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asteri
2009/2/22 Gordon Henderson
>
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, michel freiha wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP calls...My
> > next step is to choose the best hardware that I should use i order to
> have
> > the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices f
-users] Intel Vs AMD
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, michel freiha wrote:
> Hi all,
> I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP calls...My
> next step is to choose the best hardware that I should use i order to have
> the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices for my h
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, michel freiha wrote:
> Hi all,
> I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP calls...My
> next step is to choose the best hardware that I should use i order to have
> the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices for my hardware (CPU)...
> 1- Using Intel CPU
Hi all,
I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP calls...My
next step is to choose the best hardware that I should use i order to have
the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices for my hardware (CPU)...
1- Using Intel CPU or AMD
2- Use 32 or 64 bits
Can you help me please
As we are talking about pbx boxes (for large office/enterprises/ maybe ITSP?)
i think we are using server grade boxes (like hp ml3xx or bigger)
I have some servers with fan on cpu heatsink, but most of them are using
only heatsink on cpu, and redundant fans.
I think, we need some real life compar
--Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:00 AM
> >> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> >> Subject: Re: [asterisk-
03:46 p.m.
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
But my question is, those that mean that it will take 1 second to
convert 50 channels? if so do I get a 1 second latency when coverting
50 channels?
On 7/10/06, Fabio <[EMAI
ailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
Thanks for that Tzafrir. Why does it ignore the secend CPU?
BTW, on a side note on this topic, how can one calculate simultaneous
transcoded channels using show transalation?
In the case where it tel
EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de C F
Enviado el: Domingo, 09 de Julio de 2006 06:57 p.m.
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
Thanks for that Tzafrir. Why does it ignore the secend CPU?
BTW, on a side note on this topic, how ca
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:56:49PM -0400, C F wrote:
> Thanks for that Tzafrir. Why does it ignore the secend CPU?
'show translations' is done by a loop that for each pair of codecs
meassures the time it takes to convert a relatively short ammount of
data between the two.
Thus each conversion is
ooops,
sorry, you right, forgot to mention it...
It was to be compared with AMD 64.
Olivier
C F a écrit :
Olivier can you please do a cat /proc/cpuinfo and post it here? I
think you have a 64 bit cpu.
On 7/9/06, olivier.taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fyi,
Double Intel Xeon 3Ghz perform
Thanks for that Tzafrir. Why does it ignore the secend CPU?
BTW, on a side note on this topic, how can one calculate simultaneous
transcoded channels using show transalation?
In the case where it tells me 17 ms for encoding and 4 for decoding,
that gives me 21ms per channel, in what time frame c
Olivier can you please do a cat /proc/cpuinfo and post it here? I
think you have a 64 bit cpu.
On 7/9/06, olivier.taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fyi,
Double Intel Xeon 3Ghz performance below
g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc
g723 - -
Fyi,
Double Intel Xeon 3Ghz performance below
g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex
ilbc
g723 - - - - - - - - - -
-
gsm - - 2 2 2 2 1 4 10 29
14
ulaw - 2 -
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:07:16AM -0400, C F wrote:
> Tzafrir, are you trying to tell me that I can realy do double on the
> intel becuase the second CPU will do it?
In the ideal case you'll get double performance with two CPUs. In
theory.
A case of many concurrent calls is basically something t
Tzafrir, are you trying to tell me that I can realy do double on the
intel becuase the second CPU will do it?
On 7/7/06, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:32:04PM -0400, C F wrote:
> I have recently build 2 machines, one with an Intel Pentium Dual Core
> CPU, an
-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
cat /proc/cpuinfo on amd:
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 47
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+
stepping: 2
cpu MHz
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:15:35AM -0700, shadowym wrote:
> I do know that the P4 core has a much longer pipeline (20 instructions?)
> than the AMD. That is not good for a real time application and that is one
> of the reasons AMD cpu's are able to do more with less clock cycles.
Cool! The AMD
r masquerading as a P4 CPU any day.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tzafrir Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:58 PM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
>
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:32:04PM -0400, C F wrote:
> I have recently build 2 machines, one with an Intel Pentium Dual Core
> CPU, and one SATA HDD, and the other with a single AMD 64 bit CPU, and
> a RAID 1 w 2 SATA HDD. Both costed the same even though the AMD had 2
> HDDs. Here are the show tra
04:32 p.m.
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
I have recently build 2 machines, one with an Intel Pentium Dual Core
CPU, and one SATA HDD, and the other with a single AMD 64 bit CPU, and
a RAID 1 w 2 SATA HDD. Both
.
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
I have recently build 2 machines, one with an Intel Pentium Dual Core
CPU, and one SATA HDD, and the other with a single AMD 64 bit CPU, and
a RAID 1 w 2 SATA HDD. Both costed the sam
: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
I have recently build 2 machines, one with an Intel Pentium Dual Core
CPU, and one SATA HDD, and the other with a single AMD 64 bit CPU, and
a RAID 1 w 2 SATA HDD. Both costed the same even though the AMD had 2
HDDs. Here are the show translations from both
iling List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
>
> >If you want to handle, lets say 1000 calls or more at the same time,
you
> >should of course use a better processor. In my opinion, it doesn't
matter
> >whether y
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:00 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
Patrick wrote:
AMD's Opteron has more FPU power than Intel. FPU power is needed when
you do a lot of transcoding. So there is a difference besides AMD
being
cheaper.
Regards,
Patrick
On Jul 5, 2006, at 6:32 PM, varun wrote:
Thanks Patrick,
That is useful info for future.
Actually it isn't
Thanks Patrick,
That is useful info for future.
Varun
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 19:15 +0200, Patrick wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 11:00 -0400, Don wrote:
> > >If you want to handle, lets say 1000 calls or more at the same time, you
> > >should of course use a better processor. In my opinion, it d
...
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "varun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
>
>
&
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 11:00 -0400, Don wrote:
> >If you want to handle, lets say 1000 calls or more at the same time, you
> >should of course use a better processor. In my opinion, it doesn't matter
> >whether you use Intel or AMD, because you said it will be a small Asterisk.
>
> In the world o
Thanks Kai,
Wether 32 bit or 64bit does it make a difference
for asterisk ?
Varun
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 16:47 +0200, Kai Fürstenberg wrote:
> Hello Varun,
>
> varun wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I want to setup a small asterisk PBX.
> >
> > Should I use an Intel based system or
> > AMD based sys
-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
Thanks Don,
Just read something about asterisk sound
and mmx working better. So I got a little
confused.
Varun
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 11:00 -0400, Don wrote:
>If you
e more on a descent mainboard for whichever
> powerplant you chose to shove in it...
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kai Fürstenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>
> Sent: W
Don wrote:
If you want to handle, lets say 1000 calls or more at the same time,
you should of course use a better processor. In my opinion, it doesn't
matter whether you use Intel or AMD, because you said it will be a
small Asterisk.
In the world of asterisk...Intel or AMD really doesn't make
ist - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
Hello Varun,
varun wrote:
Hello,
I want to setup a small asterisk PBX.
Should I use an Intel based system or AMD based system ?
Which platform is better suited
Hello Varun,
varun wrote:
Hello,
I want to setup a small asterisk PBX.
Should I use an Intel based system or
AMD based system ?
Which platform is better suited if at
all there is difference ?
And if I were to use AMD platform then
any issues if I were to use a 64bit arch.
Most good boards
Hello,
I want to setup a small asterisk PBX.
Should I use an Intel based system or
AMD based system ?
Which platform is better suited if at
all there is difference ?
And if I were to use AMD platform then
any issues if I were to use a 64bit arch.
Most good boards seem to be for 64bit.
My dis
43 matches
Mail list logo
