[asterisk-users] Internal timing under load is critical ?

2014-07-30 Thread babak
Hi I am evaluating some voice broadcasting solutions based on Asterisks for more than 1000 simultaneous calls. Connection to Asterisk all are based on SIP and SIP Trunks so no DAHDI hardware is required. According to some recommendations like http://osdial.org/howto/  "Internal timing is very cr

Re: [asterisk-users] Internal timing under load is critical ?

2014-07-30 Thread Scott Griepentrog
If you were running on Asterisk 1.4, a Zaptel or Dahdi timing source (including the Sangoma USB device) was necessary to avoid sometimes unreliable timing from the "dummy" interface. For modern releases (1.6, 1.8, 11, 12, etc) this isn't necessary for most systems. However, you may have better re

Re: [asterisk-users] Internal timing under load is critical ?

2014-07-30 Thread Steve Edwards
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, babak wrote: According to some recommendations like http://osdial.org/howto/  "Internal timing is very critical with Asterisk when it is under load" and we must use DAHDI hardware or "USB Voice Synch Tool" http://www.sangoma.com/accessories/specialty-tools/ But according t

Re: [asterisk-users] Internal timing under load is critical ?

2014-07-30 Thread babak
Thank you for replys 1300 calls include playback voices ? which timing module you are using: res_timing_timerfd.so orres_timing_kqueue.so or res_timing_dahdi.sores_timing_pthread.so Regards On Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:16 AM, Steve Edwards wrote: On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, babak wrote: > Acc

Re: [asterisk-users] Internal timing under load is critical ?

2014-07-30 Thread Steve Edwards
Please don't top post. Please keep the thread only on the list. On Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:16 AM, Steve Edwards wrote: I'm running Asterisk 11.11.0 on an HP ProLiant DL320e Gen8 E3-1240v2. 1,300 calls with no audio issues. On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, babak wrote: 1300 calls include playback

Re: [asterisk-users] Internal timing under load is critical ?

2014-07-30 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Steve Edwards wrote: > which timing module you are using: res_timing_timerfd.so or > res_timing_kqueue.so or res_timing_dahdi.sores_timing_pthread.so > > I used res_timing_timerfd.so. I'm finally making the leap from 1.2 to the > current decade :) I read somewh

Re: [asterisk-users] Internal timing under load is critical ?

2014-07-31 Thread Chris Bagnall
On 30/7/14 10:08 am, babak wrote: I am evaluating some voice broadcasting solutions based on Asterisks for more than 1000 simultaneous calls. As a matter of curiosity, what do people use these voice broadcasting solutions for? I'm genuinely struggling to think of (legal) reasons why you'd w

Re: [asterisk-users] Internal timing under load is critical ?

2014-07-31 Thread Daniel Taylor
On 07/31/2014 09:51 AM, Chris Bagnall wrote: On 30/7/14 10:08 am, babak wrote: I am evaluating some voice broadcasting solutions based on Asterisks for more than 1000 simultaneous calls. As a matter of curiosity, what do people use these voice broadcasting solutions for? I'm genuinely strug

Re: [asterisk-users] Internal timing under load is critical ?

2014-07-31 Thread babak
> As a matter of curiosity, what do people use these voice broadcasting > solutions for? > > I'm genuinely struggling to think of (legal) reasons why you'd want to > broadcast 1000+ simultaneous calls. Perhaps I'm just not being > imaginative enough... :-) > > Kind regards, > > Chris For a