On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Lyle Underwood wrote:
> If call recordings were stored in stereo and the callers were evenly
> distributed along the stereo spectrum. BAM.
Cisco has this. It's called telepresence. It costs a LOT of money, and
takes a LOT of bandwidth, but you do get spatial distri
I have very little idea of what any of this stuff means. I know very
little about the inner-working of Asterisk, and I sort of joined this
list to glean some knowledge. All I've heard about Mixmonitor is
somebody talking earlier about how it was called after a recording was
completed to handle cust
om] On Behalf Of Lyle
> Underwood
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:40 PM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [asterisk-users] Know what would be killer?
>
> If call recordings were stored in stereo and the callers were evenly
> distributed along the stereo spect
m.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Lyle
Underwood
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:40 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Know what would be killer?
If call recordings were stored in stereo and the callers were evenly
distributed along the s
Evenly distributed? like with conferences? or with Mixmonitor having
two sides to record?
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Lyle Underwood wrote:
> If call recordings were stored in stereo and the callers were evenly
> distributed along the stereo spectrum. BAM.
>
> Just a cool idea I thought up, b
If call recordings were stored in stereo and the callers were evenly
distributed along the stereo spectrum. BAM.
Just a cool idea I thought up, but probably completely impossible, and
even if not, likely too much work for too little reward. Even less
likely would be live stereo conference calling.
