yeah, 'enough' adds back the gray area that the black-and-white 'atomic'
obscures... :P
Moj
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC wrote:
>
>> set your own mutex using astdb? It may just be atomic enough for you to
>> get by.
>
> "atomic enough" - that's a nice term :-)
>
Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC wrote:
> set your own mutex using astdb? It may just be atomic enough for you to
> get by.
"atomic enough" - that's a nice term :-)
Regards,
Philipp Kempgen
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve proble
I'm going to try it out, but I'm not very hopefull although it's exactly
what's needed. My macro contains a Dial() command and my concern is that
the dialplan isn't considered done untill Dial() returns. But I'm going to
try it. Will report back shortly.
On 8/7/07, Jared Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED
set your own mutex using astdb? It may just be atomic enough for you to
get by.
Nicholas Blasgen wrote:
> I've got 4 SIP phone lines with a call-limit of 2 for each. I've
> written a handy macro to allow my users to dial a phone number and the
> macro will figure out the next available line t
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:13 -0700, Nicholas Blasgen wrote:
> My question is this. Is it possible to tell Asterisk to execute part
> of a macro as a block without allowing any other commands to be
> processed during that time?
You'll want to check out the MacroExclusive() application. It does
e
I've got 4 SIP phone lines with a call-limit of 2 for each. I've written a
handy macro to allow my users to dial a phone number and the macro will
figure out the next available line to use by first checking if the GROUP()
is over 2 and then checking to see if ChanIsAvail() as a backup, and if it
c
