Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-09 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:13:38 +, Steven Howes wrote: >Why not just use the latest version?.. Because converting Asterisk to run on that non-x86 platform is quite some work, so I need to know what I'm missing by staying with a 1.4.x release. -- _

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-09 Thread Steven Howes
On 9 Feb 2012, at 11:08, Gilles wrote: > Does someone of a good site/blog that keeps track of new releases of > Asterisk, and explains what the major changes/features when they do > occur? Why not just use the latest version?.. S -- ___

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-09 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:23:54 -0600 (CST), Richard Mudgett wrote: >The CHANGES file is not just a dump. It is a manually created file that >documents each feature addition. There is a ChangeLog file that is a dump >of every single commit made to the source file. Sorry about that. Indeed, the CHA

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-09 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:17:46 -0800, Chad Wallace wrote: >Maybe the release announcements are what you're looking for. e.g., >for 1.8: > >http://www.asterisk.org/node/51444 > >And you can probably find the same for 1.4, 1.6.x, and 10 without too >much trouble. Thanks. It's closer to what I was loo

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-08 Thread Richard Mudgett
> >No, unfortunately that's not quite correct. The UPGRADE files list > >*important* changes that users need to know about because they are > >changes in behavior of existing functionality. New features, even > >really > >useful and widely anticipated ones, that don't cause backwards > >compatibili

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-08 Thread Chad Wallace
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:31:00 +0100 Gilles wrote: > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:58:43 -0600, "Kevin P. Fleming" > wrote: > >No, unfortunately that's not quite correct. The UPGRADE files list > >*important* changes that users need to know about because they are > >changes in behavior of existing func

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-08 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:58:43 -0600, "Kevin P. Fleming" wrote: >No, unfortunately that's not quite correct. The UPGRADE files list >*important* changes that users need to know about because they are >changes in behavior of existing functionality. New features, even really >useful and widely anti

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-08 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 02/07/2012 09:07 AM, Gilles wrote: On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:31:31 +, Steven Howes wrote: The upgrade files may be more to your tastes than changes files. Thanks. I downloaded and untarred asterisk-1.8.8.0.tar.gz, and it looks like the UPGRADE*.txt files within tarballs are the closest th

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-07 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:10:37 -1000, Jean-Denis Girard wrote: >This link also presents changes between Asterisk versions: >http://linuxinnovations.com/applications1.4-1.6.2.html Thanks for the link. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocat

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-07 Thread Jean-Denis Girard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 06/02/2012 04:04, Gilles a écrit : > Hello > > Is there a document that sums up the major changes made to the four > main releases available (1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 10), to check if it's > worth upgrading? This link also presents changes between Aster

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-07 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:31:31 +, Steven Howes wrote: >The upgrade files may be more to your tastes than changes files. Thanks. I downloaded and untarred asterisk-1.8.8.0.tar.gz, and it looks like the UPGRADE*.txt files within tarballs are the closest there is to knowing what major features were

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-07 Thread Steven Howes
On 7 Feb 2012, at 14:27, Gilles wrote: > On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:24:42 -0600 (CST), Richard Mudgett > wrote: >> The UPGRADE.txt and CHANGES files do just that. They have been a part >> of the Asterisk source files for a long time. > > Thanks for the info. The problem is that the ChangeLog files >

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-07 Thread Gilles
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:24:42 -0600 (CST), Richard Mudgett wrote: >The UPGRADE.txt and CHANGES files do just that. They have been a part >of the Asterisk source files for a long time. Thanks for the info. The problem is that the ChangeLog files http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asteris

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-06 Thread Danny Nicholas
Richard Mudgett Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 10:25 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10? > Is there a document that sums up the major changes made to the four > main releases available (1.4, 1.6, 1.

Re: [asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-06 Thread Richard Mudgett
> Is there a document that sums up the major changes made to the four > main releases available (1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 10), to check if it's > worth upgrading? > > www.asterisk.org/downloads The UPGRADE.txt and CHANGES files do just that. They have been a part of the Asterisk source files for a lon

[asterisk-users] Major changes between 1.4/1.6.1.8/10?

2012-02-06 Thread Gilles
Hello Is there a document that sums up the major changes made to the four main releases available (1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 10), to check if it's worth upgrading? www.asterisk.org/downloads Thank you. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocatio