Yitzhak Bar Geva wrote:
How can one measure the effect of NAT traversal packet loss?
We currently have no solution for NAT traversal for our SIP clients.
We've recently completed a setup (see other threads) with a couple of
SIP clients behind NAT in their respective home-offices. Took a
How can one measure the effect of NAT traversal packet loss?
We currently have no solution for NAT traversal for our SIP clients. There
is no doubt that packets are getting lost. What is not clear is how much
damage this does. On the face of it, everything seems fine. Could this be
so? Perhaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yitzhak Bar Geva wrote:
How can one measure the effect of NAT traversal packet loss?
We currently have no solution for NAT traversal for our SIP clients. There
is no doubt that packets are getting lost. What is not clear is how much
damage this