Re: [asterisk-users] NAT traversal packet loss measurement

2007-10-23 Thread Per Jessen
Yitzhak Bar Geva wrote: How can one measure the effect of NAT traversal packet loss? We currently have no solution for NAT traversal for our SIP clients. We've recently completed a setup (see other threads) with a couple of SIP clients behind NAT in their respective home-offices. Took a

[asterisk-users] NAT traversal packet loss measurement

2007-10-22 Thread Yitzhak Bar Geva
How can one measure the effect of NAT traversal packet loss? We currently have no solution for NAT traversal for our SIP clients. There is no doubt that packets are getting lost. What is not clear is how much damage this does. On the face of it, everything seems fine. Could this be so? Perhaps

Re: [asterisk-users] NAT traversal packet loss measurement

2007-10-22 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yitzhak Bar Geva wrote: How can one measure the effect of NAT traversal packet loss? We currently have no solution for NAT traversal for our SIP clients. There is no doubt that packets are getting lost. What is not clear is how much damage this