[asterisk-users] OT - "T.38 unreliable on a LAN" : truth or obscurantism ?

2012-02-15 Thread Olivier
Hi, When someone says "T.38 is not reliable on a (normally loaded and managed) LAN", would you rather agree or disagree ? In this case, fax calls are coming in through an analog gateway, passing trough Asterisk and then going out to ISDN through a digital gateway. Comments ? Regards --

Re: [asterisk-users] OT - "T.38 unreliable on a LAN" : truth or obscurantism ?

2012-02-15 Thread Tim Nelson
- Original Message - > Hi, > > When someone says "T.38 is not reliable on a (normally loaded and > managed) LAN", would you rather agree or disagree ? > In this case, fax calls are coming in through an analog gateway, > passing trough Asterisk and then going out to ISDN through a digital >

Re: [asterisk-users] OT - "T.38 unreliable on a LAN" : truth or obscurantism ?

2012-02-15 Thread Darren Nickerson
T.38 is tolerant of most network conditions, ... the challenges in getting reliable performance are usually limited to getting the interop right once, but the absolute success rate will depend on the quality of your T.38/PSTN gateway's fax implementation. In general terms, T.38 is actually the r

Re: [asterisk-users] OT - "T.38 unreliable on a LAN" : truth or obscurantism ?

2012-02-15 Thread Olivier
2012/2/15, Tim Nelson : > - Original Message - >> Hi, >> >> When someone says "T.38 is not reliable on a (normally loaded and >> managed) LAN", would you rather agree or disagree ? >> In this case, fax calls are coming in through an analog gateway, >> passing trough Asterisk and then going

Re: [asterisk-users] OT - "T.38 unreliable on a LAN" : truth or obscurantism ?

2012-02-15 Thread Olivier
2012/2/15, Darren Nickerson : > T.38 is tolerant of most network conditions, ... the challenges in getting > reliable performance are usually limited to getting the interop right once, > but the absolute success rate will depend on the quality of your T.38/PSTN > gateway's fax implementation. In ge

Re: [asterisk-users] OT - "T.38 unreliable on a LAN" : truth or obscurantism ?

2012-02-15 Thread Darren Nickerson
On Feb 15, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Olivier wrote: > 2012/2/15, Darren Nickerson : >> T.38 is tolerant of most network conditions, ... the challenges in getting >> reliable performance are usually limited to getting the interop right once, >> but the absolute success rate will depend on the quality of y

Re: [asterisk-users] OT - "T.38 unreliable on a LAN" : truth or obscurantism ?

2012-02-15 Thread Darren Nickerson
On Feb 15, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Olivier wrote: > 2012/2/15, Tim Nelson : >> - Original Message - >>> Hi, >>> >>> When someone says "T.38 is not reliable on a (normally loaded and >>> managed) LAN", would you rather agree or disagree ? >>> In this case, fax calls are coming in through an ana

Re: [asterisk-users] OT - "T.38 unreliable on a LAN" : truth or obscurantism ?

2012-02-15 Thread James Sharp
On 02/15/2012 03:03 PM, Olivier wrote: Hi, When someone says "T.38 is not reliable on a (normally loaded and managed) LAN", would you rather agree or disagree ? In this case, fax calls are coming in through an analog gateway, passing trough Asterisk and then going out to ISDN through a digital g

Re: [asterisk-users] OT - "T.38 unreliable on a LAN" : truth or obscurantism ?

2012-02-16 Thread Adam Moffett
On 02/15/2012 05:33 PM, James Sharp wrote: On 02/15/2012 03:03 PM, Olivier wrote: Hi, When someone says "T.38 is not reliable on a (normally loaded and managed) LAN", would you rather agree or disagree ? In this case, fax calls are coming in through an analog gateway, passing trough Asterisk an