Hello all.
I have an NEC PBX connected via a TE210p E1 line to an asterisk 1.6 box.
NEC -> E1 -> TE210P:1 -> * -> TE210P:2 -> E1 -> Telco
Incomming calls from the telco to the asterisk box to the NEC work fine with
indials and everything. Works sweet.
Outbound from the NEC to the Asterisk box
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have an NEC PBX connected via a TE210p E1 line to an asterisk 1.6 box.
>
> NEC -> E1 -> TE210P:1 -> * -> TE210P:2 -> E1 -> Telco
>
> Incomming calls from the telco to the asterisk box to the NEC work fine with
> indi
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Tony Mountifield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have an NEC PBX connected via a TE210p E1 line to an asterisk 1.6 box.
> > NEC -> E1 -> TE210P:1 -> * -> TE210P:2 -> E1 -> Telco
> > In
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Tony Mountifield <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I have an NEC PBX connected via a TE210p E1 line to a
OK, made some progress.
With some help from friends on #Asterisk, found that the NEC was doing post
connect dialing.
So then, added the following to extensions.conf:
[from-nec]
exten => s,1,Answer()
exten => s,n,Set(TIMEOUT(digit)=2)
exten => s,n,Set(TIMEOUT(response)=5)
exten => s,n,Read(DialedN
Good. Got the darn thing working.
Problem was the NEC Xen Master does post-connect DTMF to dial. So I had to
read the digits after connect.
Then, I had to configure the PRI to be pridialplan = unknown
Thanks for your help Tony.
Here is the end result for Google's sake
#
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good. Got the darn thing working.
Good news! Been away from the computer for a while, so wasn't able to
keep up with your efforts.
> Problem was the NEC Xen Master does post-connect DTMF to dial. So I had to
> read t
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Tony Mountifield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
Actually, if Read() works, then WaitExten should have worked too. I expect
> what was missing was the Answer(). So this ought to work as an alternative:
It doesn't for some reason... I end up getting the timeout call
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Tony Mountifield
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> Actually, if Read() works, then WaitExten should have worked too. I expect
> > what was missing was the Answer(). So this ought to w
