RE: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-07 Thread Watkins, Bradley
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John Treble > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 10:44 AM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: R

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-07 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
ge- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Fredrickson Sent: June 6, 2007 4:02 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting I think what they're talking about is forwarding th

RE: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-07 Thread John Treble
erisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Fredrickson > Sent: June 6, 2007 4:02 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting > > I think what they're talking about is forwarding the

RE: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-07 Thread John Treble
June 7, 2007 4:09 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting > > We are currently connecting to TeliaSonera in Denmark, and they said it > should be supported via PRI supplementary services. > I th

RE: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-07 Thread Jon Schøpzinsky
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting I think what they're talking about is forwarding the call before the call is established. If I remember correctly, it's call CF[U,B,NR] for call forward on unavailable, bu

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-06 Thread Anthony Francis
You are right. It would be nice to "redirect" the calling party so that it connects the calling party to the forwarded number instead of using multiple channels. Matthew Fredrickson wrote: I think what they're talking about is forwarding the call before the call is established. If I remember

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-06 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
I think what they're talking about is forwarding the call before the call is established. If I remember correctly, it's call CF[U,B,NR] for call forward on unavailable, busy, and no response. Unfortunately though, none of the switchtypes support this variant of this function. However, if 2BC

RE: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-06 Thread John Treble
ng List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting > > Jon Schøpzinsky wrote: > > Hello List > > > > We are trying to redirect calls directly, instead of opening a new > channel and dialing out. > > Etc: > > > >

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-06 Thread Eric \"ManxPower\" Wieling
Jon Schøpzinsky wrote: Hello List We are trying to redirect calls directly, instead of opening a new channel and dialing out. Etc: A calls B on our asterisk, and is directly redirected to C We have been told that this feature should be available on a PRI level, and is called Partial re-rout

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-06 Thread Anthony Francis
This is of great interest to me as well, it would nice be able to send a "Temporarily moved to ''" out the PSTN just like you can do in sip. Jon Schøpzinsky wrote: Hello List We are trying to redirect calls directly, instead of opening a new channel and dialing out. Etc: A calls B on our ast

[asterisk-users] PRI Partial Re-Rounting

2007-06-06 Thread Jon Schøpzinsky
Hello List We are trying to redirect calls directly, instead of opening a new channel and dialing out. Etc: A calls B on our asterisk, and is directly redirected to C We have been told that this feature should be available on a PRI level, and is called Partial re-routing. Anybody has an idea