On Tuesday 16 October 2007 06:21:45 Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
GotoIf($[${DIALSTATUS} = BUSY]?busy)
GotoIf($[${DIALSTATUS} = NOANSWER]?noanswer)
GotoIf($[${DIALSTATUS} = ANSWERED]?answered)
Dial(Zap/...)
Of course, I do this inside a macro, and I emit correct CDR and correct
hangupcauses for
- Original Message -
From: Mojo with Horan Company, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 1:20 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PSTN failover
Dovid B wrote:
Chanisavail does
- Original Message -
From: Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PSTN failover
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Dovid B wrote:
Chanisavail
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 03:49:37 Atis Lezdins wrote:
Well, as far as i have tried - i never get ANSWERED in DIALSTATUS. Only
thing that continues is h extension.
You must of course use 'g' in the Dial flags so that it continues on in the
dialplan after hangup...
-A.
Hi,
Does anyone have any advice in how to implement PSTN failover should an
internet connection for IAX trunking go down? to route outbound to
analog lines
Can this be written into the dialplan using a GotoIf statement by
testing the whether the internet connection is up, or from a IAX/SIP
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Robert McNaught wrote:
Does anyone have any advice in how to implement PSTN failover should an
internet connection for IAX trunking go down? to route outbound to
analog lines
Can this be written into the dialplan using a GotoIf statement by
testing the whether the
PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PSTN failover
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Robert McNaught wrote:
Does anyone have any advice in how to implement PSTN failover should an
internet connection for IAX trunking go down? to route outbound to
analog lines
Can this be written into the dialplan using
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Dovid B wrote:
Chanisavail does not work well for this. I would use priority jumping
(n+101).
Why not?
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Direct : +1-678-954-0671
Dovid B wrote:
Chanisavail does not work well for this. I would use priority jumping
(n+101).
Using ChanIsAvail with the 's' option is supposed to assume a SIP
channel is occupied if it's in use ANYWHERE under asterisk's wing. For
clarification, Dovid, have your poor experiences
Alex Balashov wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Dovid B wrote:
Chanisavail does not work well for this. I would use priority jumping
(n+101).
Why not?
Priority jumping is no solution to failover, it's just an ugly
hack. ;)
I'd basically just Dial() 2 times:
Dial(SIP/...);
Dial(Zap/...);
I don't really understand how ChanIsAvail() can be of any use.
Even if it tells you that the channel is available there's no
guarantee that the call will go through.
And moreover between the ChanIsAvail() check and the Dial()
command someone else could have taken the channel.
Regards,
Philipp
On Monday 15 October 2007 19:50:03 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
I'd basically just Dial() 2 times:
Dial(SIP/...);
Dial(Zap/...);
No need for priority jumping. And not need to check if
the ChanIsAvail(). Just Dial().
Why not just do it the correct way?
Dial(SIP/,,g)
GotoIf($[${DIALSTATUS} =
12 matches
Mail list logo
