On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:10:33 -0500, Ulexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Compare, too, the respective access times between flash and RAM, not to
>mention the write session limits of flash (though again, to consider
>this is to make another mountain out of a mole hill).
I'll probably put Linux + Aste
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:30:50 +0100, Hans Witvliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Seems what you write is somehow misleading
I meant that I ordered some CF cards, but until they get here, and
since this baby can boot off a remote server with PXE, I was looking
for a PXEd Asterisk that I could use to c
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 04:41:42PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Run entirely from RAM? So if your image is 40MB, you waste 40MB of RAM
> just to store it? This is where (A) becomes suddenly a lot nicer.
> Especially if you can use union-mouting and thus to have to use such a
> specific system.
40
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 03:30:50PM +0100, Hans Witvliet wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 09:06 +0100, Vincent wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:15:22 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Yes. I have a version of our CD that boots from PXE. It took minor
> > >changes and rebuilding
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 09:06 +0100, Vincent wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:15:22 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Yes. I have a version of our CD that boots from PXE. It took minor
> >changes and rebuilding as a "PXE image", as Debian Live has basic
> >support of that already.
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 09:06:17AM +0100, Vincent wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:15:22 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Yes. I have a version of our CD that boots from PXE. It took minor
> >changes and rebuilding as a "PXE image", as Debian Live has basic
> >support of that alr
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:15:22 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes. I have a version of our CD that boots from PXE. It took minor
>changes and rebuilding as a "PXE image", as Debian Live has basic
>support of that already. For simplicity I figure you'll be after a
>system that has e
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:01:47 -0600, "Michael Graves"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm not at all certain what you need to change on the hardware, but it
>seems to me it should be trivial. Perhaps something in the BIOS?
I was looking at ways to boot it up over the network, and keep
everything in RA
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 02:34:45AM +0100, Vincent wrote:
> Hello
>
> Since I got the IBM Netvista to boot Linux, and am still waiting for
> the Compact Flash cards that I ordered, I was wondering if someone
> knew of an Asterisk distribution that can run on that kind of diskless
> host?
Yes. I ha
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 02:34:45 +0100, Vincent wrote:
>Hello
>
>Since I got the IBM Netvista to boot Linux, and am still waiting for
>the Compact Flash cards that I ordered, I was wondering if someone
>knew of an Asterisk distribution that can run on that kind of diskless
>host?
>
>I've taken a look
Hello
Since I got the IBM Netvista to boot Linux, and am still waiting for
the Compact Flash cards that I ordered, I was wondering if someone
knew of an Asterisk distribution that can run on that kind of diskless
host?
I've taken a look at AstLinux and AskoziaPBX, but they both seem to be
meant t
11 matches
Mail list logo
