Re: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-19 Thread Doug Lytle
Bruce Reeves wrote: Here is the bug: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8804 I have not tried the svn version yet, I modified my features.c file as noted in the bug and have been running it successfully. Looks like I'll have to manually make the changes as well. The current 1.2 Branch seems

RE: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-19 Thread Greg Scasny
- Fax. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Reeves Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 12:32 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key Here is the bug: http://bugs.digi

RE: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-19 Thread Greg Scasny
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Lytle Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 12:45 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key Bruce Reeves wrote: > Here is the bug: h

Re: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-19 Thread Doug Lytle
Bruce Reeves wrote: Here is the bug: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8804 Thank you very much! Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." ___

Re: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-19 Thread Bruce Reeves
Here is the bug: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8804 I have not tried the svn version yet, I modified my features.c file as noted in the bug and have been running it successfully. On 1/19/07, Doug Lytle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bruce Reeves wrote: > A fix was posted to the svn version of

Re: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-19 Thread Doug Lytle
Bruce Reeves wrote: A fix was posted to the svn version of 1.2 and 1.4. The actual revision number I do not recall. Bruce, Have you had a chance to test? I've been looking for the last hour for the bug report I thought you posted earlier this week, but haven't found anything. Doug --

Re: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-19 Thread Bruce Reeves
*Sent:* Thursday, January 11, 2007 2:29 PM *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key I am perplexed by this so I how someone can help me out. On one of my servers the users began complaining that if they picked up a parked cal

RE: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-19 Thread Greg Scasny
ubject: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key I am perplexed by this so I how someone can help me out. On one of my servers the users began complaining that if they picked up a parked call they could not use the # key to transfer the call. This is a particualarly annoying issue since everyo

Re: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-12 Thread Bruce Reeves
The problem was actually introduced in issue 8406 in mantis, and in the SVN release 48154. Kind of makes me feel better knowing it is not my dial plan. I agree with the fix, but I need a way around it, since it does not apply to my setups. On 1/12/07, Doug Lytle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bruc

Re: [asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-12 Thread Doug Lytle
Bruce Reeves wrote: I am perplexed by this so I how someone can help me out. On one of my servers the users began complaining that if they picked up a parked call they could not use the # key to transfer the call. This is a particualarly annoying issue since everyone has been taught to use #7

[asterisk-users] Parked calls and the # key

2007-01-11 Thread Bruce Reeves
I am perplexed by this so I how someone can help me out. On one of my servers the users began complaining that if they picked up a parked call they could not use the # key to transfer the call. This is a particualarly annoying issue since everyone has been taught to use #700 to park calls. At fir