Just got one of these. Horrible to program.
Trying to key in the FTP server. Won't even
remember the info after rebooting.
Anybody know the proper way to beat on this
stupid beast so it will work?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www
Of Doug
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 2:41 PM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom 320 - Can it actually be configured?
>
> Just got one of these. Horrible to program.
> Trying to key in the FTP server. Won't even
> remember t
gt; > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 2:41 PM
> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> > Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom 320 - Can it actually be configured?
> >
>
gt;> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 2:41 PM
>> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>> Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom 320 - Can it actually be configured?
>>
>> Just got one of these. Horrible to program.
>> Trying to key in the FTP server. Won't even
>> re
lf Of Doug
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 2:41 PM
> >> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> >> Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom 320 - Can it actually be configured?
> >>
> >> Just got one of these. Horrible to program.
> >> Trying to
rs Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom 320 - Can it actually be
configured?
At 16:49 8/1/2007, Douglas Garstang wrote:
>Don't know about the 320, but we provisioned the 301's. They're
>provisioning is basically the same as the 501&#
risk-users-
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 2:41 PM
> > >> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> > >> Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom 320 - Can it actually be configured?
> >
