Ok thanks Shaun!
Best regards.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:12:41PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> > Just one last question: do you have another suggestion about this?
> >
> > thanks.
>
> Not really. There are other ways that dahdi_
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:12:41PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> Just one last question: do you have another suggestion about this?
>
> thanks.
Not really. There are other ways that dahdi_cfg could serialize
itself, but POSIX semaphores are widely deployed on systems that are
installing
Just one last question: do you have another suggestion about this?
thanks.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira <
rodrigoborgespere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I created /dev/shm and mounted tmpfs on it, and the problem is no
> more. Just creating /dev/shm was not enough.
>
Well, I created /dev/shm and mounted tmpfs on it, and the problem is no
more. Just creating /dev/shm was not enough.
thanks.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:55:41PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> > Maybe the problem is lack of tmpfs?
>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:55:41PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> Maybe the problem is lack of tmpfs?
>
> statfs("/dev/shm", 0xbff88568) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
> directory)
>
> Is this a new requirement for DAHDI?
tmpfs is not a requirement per-se, but it's how most POSIX
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:49:49PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> Hello Shaun,
>
> This system is a custom distro, based on debian and currently built around
> kernel 2.6.35.8. Is sem_open introduced only in DAHDI 2.9 ?
Yes. It was added in [1] in order to prevent errors when multiple
inv
Maybe the problem is lack of tmpfs?
statfs("/dev/shm", 0xbff88568) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
Is this a new requirement for DAHDI?
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira <
rodrigoborgespere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Shaun,
>
> This system is a custom
Hello Shaun,
This system is a custom distro, based on debian and currently built around
kernel 2.6.35.8. Is sem_open introduced only in DAHDI 2.9 ?
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:21:24PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:21:24PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Getting this error on dahdi_cfg. Reverting to 2.8 the error goes away:
>
> *line 15: Unable to create 'dahdi_cfg' mutex.*
>
> Is this a problem?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Full detail:
>
> [ebox]> dahdi_cfg -
Hello,
Getting this error on dahdi_cfg. Reverting to 2.8 the error goes away:
*line 15: Unable to create 'dahdi_cfg' mutex.*
Is this a problem?
Thanks in advance.
Full detail:
[ebox]> dahdi_cfg -vvv
DAHDI Tools Version - 2.9.0.1
DAHDI Version: 2.9.0
Echo Canceller(s): HWEC
Configuration
10 matches
Mail list logo
