Does anyone know how setting the TOS bits in iax.conf corresponds to
the Cisco TOS types?
For example, if I set:
tos=0x04
in iax.conf, and on the Cisco, I use:
access-list 110 permit ip any any tos 4
I can't get the Cisco to match any packets. I've tried various
combinations of numbers on both
I'm thinking of using ISA 2004 for QoS with asterisk.
Right now I'm using FreeBSD with Packet Filter as a firewall and traffic
shaper to do QoS for my Asterisk setup.
I wanted to explore other options, like ISA 2004. Has anyone implemented it
for asterisk? Any gotchas?
___
Sorry for the late, late reply, but I don't follow the -users list
closely.
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 10:43 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What's wrong with doing it by port? If it is possible that something
> else out there may use the same TOS flags as Asterisk, by prioritizing
> port 4569 (IAX
> This DLink switch will prioritize data if it has already been tagged by
> either the ATAs or Asterisk. In reviewing the Asteisk documentation I can
> not see that Asterisk offers this functionality (of course I could have
> missed the information). So my question is, does Asterisk offer the abili
Thank you to both Robert and Manjit for your suggestions and pointers.
Regards,
Dale
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 12:56 PM
Subject
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 1:45 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] QoS tagging - can Asterisk do this,
> if not,what do you recommend?
>
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] QoS tagging - can Asterisk do this, if not,what do
you recommend?
Hello,
We have setup an Asterisk box and are trying to implement QoS (Quality of
Service) on our network. We purchased a DLink DES 3226L managed switch as
DLink told us this wo
Hello,
We have setup an Asterisk box and are trying to implement QoS (Quality of
Service) on our network. We purchased a DLink DES 3226L managed switch as
DLink told us this would do the trick for us. It appears they were wrong.
This DLink switch will prioritize data if it has already been tagged
risk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] QOS /
Cisco / Asterisk > What's
wrong with doing it by port? We're actually using SIP to terminate
calls, going by rtp.conf the portscould range several thousand ports. What
we're going for is onlyhonoring TOS for that particular cu
> What's wrong with doing it by port?
We're actually using SIP to terminate calls, going by rtp.conf the ports
could range several thousand ports. What we're going for is only
honoring TOS for that particular customer, luckily these are T1
customers hosted on our routers. They understand that
We're trying to PQ (Priority Queue) packets on a Cisco using ACL's.
---
You do not want to use PQ for
voice QOS. You will still receive far too much
jitter. Instead configure LLQ which was specifically designed for
voice scheduling on an interface. Aside
> What's wrong with doing it by port?
We're actually using SIP to terminate calls, going by rtp.conf the ports
could range several thousand ports. What we're going for is only
honoring TOS for that particular customer, luckily these are T1
customers hosted on our routers. They understand that th
> We're trying to PQ (Priority Queue)
packets on a Cisco using ACL's. What
> we're trying to avoid is hardcoding the IP address in the ACL. We
were
> trying to match by TOS set by Asterisk however it seems we've run
into a
> snag where the packet TOS tends to get reset somewhere on our network.
>
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 13:53 -0600, Matt Schulte wrote:
> We're trying to PQ (Priority Queue) packets on a Cisco using ACL's. What
> we're trying to avoid is hardcoding the IP address in the ACL. We were
> trying to match by TOS set by Asterisk however it seems we've run into a
> snag where the pack
Yes yes, your right. I forget these switches are smart!!! ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Julio Arruda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 4:41 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] QOS / Cisco / Asterisk
Matt
Matt Schulte wrote:
We're trying to PQ (Priority Queue) packets on a Cisco using ACL's. What
we're trying to avoid is hardcoding the IP address in the ACL. We were
trying to match by TOS set by Asterisk however it seems we've run into a
snag where the packet TOS tends to get reset somewhere on our
We're trying to PQ (Priority Queue) packets on a Cisco using ACL's. What
we're trying to avoid is hardcoding the IP address in the ACL. We were
trying to match by TOS set by Asterisk however it seems we've run into a
snag where the packet TOS tends to get reset somewhere on our network.
Has anyone
what are you running on Fedora Core to shape the traffic?
Traffic Control "tc" is included
in the 2.4 kernel and forward. See http://lartc.org/. Basically,
I have a script that is setup as a service to set up the bridge and the
traffic control queues.
let's say that you have VPN site to site tu
On December 15, 2004 11:40 pm, Me wrote:
> Is there some sort of box/device that I can place between the T1 router and
> the firewall box which will allow me to prioritize voice traffic on this
> link?
Put iproute2 and tc on the firewall. Limit the traffic out of the firewall to
the T1 router to
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] QOS Device?
I will be putting documentation together shortly on how to build a
high-availability QoS setup using 2 spare PCs and 4 NICs. I've been very
successful with this approach for a T-1 that shares both Citrix and Video
Conferenci
I will be putting documentation together
shortly on how to build a high-availability QoS setup using 2 spare PCs
and 4 NICs. I've been very successful with this approach for a T-1 that
shares both Citrix and Video Conferencing + normal web traffic and such.
The real key is a combination of packet
It's a small hardware device with 3 interfaces. It bridges packets on two
of the interfaces and the other interface is a management port. It works by
forcing equal access to bandwidth by slowing bandwidth hogging connections.
It also allows you to give priority to ip addresses or applications.
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:12 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] QOS Device?
Here is the situation:
A T1 router going into an office which then plugs into the firewall box
then
into the switch.
None of these devices support QOS..
Is there some sort of box/device that I can pla
Here is the situation:
A T1 router going into an office which then plugs into the firewall box then
into the switch.
None of these devices support QOS..
Is there some sort of box/device that I can place between the T1 router and
the firewall box which will allow me to prioritize voice traffi
Here is the situation:
A T1 router going into an office which then plugs into the firewall box then
into the switch.
None of these devices support QOS..
Is there some sort of box/device that I can place between the T1 router and
the firewall box which will allow me to prioritize voice traffic on
> Matthew Boehm
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 7:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] QoS Router/Software Suggestions
>
> I've got a Linksys BEFSR41 at home with RoadRunner service.
> I'm pretty sure it doesn't do QoS. I'm using WinX
aving the extra phone-line on site.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Graves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:23 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] QoS Router/Software Suggestions
>
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:58:06 -0400, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
>Not with an area served by Covad. Speakeasy uses Covad to deliver the
>DSL service and Covad recently introduced their OneLink service which
>does NOT require an active phone line for DSL services. What they do
>is charge $6/mo over the
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Geoff Nordli wrote:
> Is this where we get to vote for our favorite router software? I choose
> Bering-uClibc
> (http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpage&menu=910&page_id=36). It
> comes with a ton of packages, and you can easily configure it to boot from
> HDD, or C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Try m0n0wall. http://m0n0.ch/wall/. Runs on cheapo old PC with dual
> NICs or Soekris embedded platfroms. Very nice traffic shaping/QoS.
>
> Michael
>
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:00:24 -0500, Matthew Boehm wrote:
>
>> I've got a Linksys BEFSR41 at home with RoadRunner se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Try m0n0wall. http://m0n0.ch/wall/. Runs on cheapo old PC with dual
> NICs or Soekris embedded platfroms. Very nice traffic shaping/QoS.
>
> Michael
>
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:00:24 -0500, Matthew Boehm wrote:
>
>> I've got a Linksys BEFSR41 at home with RoadRunner se
Try m0n0wall. http://m0n0.ch/wall/. Runs on cheapo old PC with dual
NICs or Soekris embedded platfroms. Very nice traffic shaping/QoS.
Michael
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:00:24 -0500, Matthew Boehm wrote:
>I've got a Linksys BEFSR41 at home with RoadRunner service. I'm pretty sure
>it doesn't do QoS
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Matthew Boehm wrote:
> Switching to DSL would require me to get a phone line, which kinda defeats
> the purpose of doing VoIP. =)
>
> Matthew
Matthew, for unparalelled hackability try the Linksys WRT54GS. It runs
Linux, and supports QOS if you use the Sveasoft (http://www.s
tober 12, 2004 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] QoS Router/Software Suggestions
I've got a Linksys BEFSR41 at home with RoadRunner service. I'm pretty sure
it doesn't do QoS. I'm using WinXP Pro and not sure if it does QoS. I'm
using SJ Phone and..
Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] QoS Router/Software Suggestions
Switching to DSL would require me to get a phone line, which kinda defeats
the purpose of doing VoIP. =)
Matthew
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Wilkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "As
o: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] QoS Router/Software Suggestions
>
> > For what it's worth, I just shutdown my PC based gateway last week and
Not with an area served by Covad. Speakeasy uses Covad to deliver the
DSL service and Covad recently introduced their OneLink service which
does NOT require an active phone line for DSL services. What they do
is charge $6/mo over the cost of regular service and run a dry pair to
your location
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] QoS Router/Software Suggestions
> For what it's worth, I just shutdown my PC based gateway last week and
> replaced it with an Efficient Networks 5861 ADSL router. The 5861 is
> billed as a Business Class DSL Ro
For what it's worth, I just shutdown my PC based gateway last week and
replaced it with an Efficient Networks 5861 ADSL router. The 5861 is
billed as a Business Class DSL Router. It comes with Stateful
Firewall, DHCP, NAT, VPN, and QoS (WFQ), among other things. I have
not setup the QoS yet,
I've got a Linksys BEFSR41 at home with RoadRunner service. I'm pretty sure
it doesn't do QoS. I'm using WinXP Pro and not sure if it does QoS. I'm
using SJ Phone and...(follow the pattern).
I have to stop all network traffic on my machine if I want to have any hopes
of making a clear call. But I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 12 Jul 2004 at 8:22, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > Why not just work with qualify? If the connection is too lagged *
> > won't make the call through it (although if the link BECOMES laggy it
> > will continue to use the connection).
> >
> Qualify will only stop the call
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Qualify will only stop the call going through if for example the ping
> is above 200ms. I find most of my problems come from fluctuating
> ping times (~100ms) than from a stable high ping.
I agree that the overall delay isn't really the proble
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use IAX trunking and a ping script to check times and fluctuations
to my remote offices.
Could you share this AGI?
- seems like a useful example :)
Thanks a lot,
F
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.
Would you consider posting this this to the wiki? :)
I think that would be great.
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 08:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 12 Jul 2004 at 14:06, Michael Bielicki wrote:
>
> > how do you ping a TDM connection ?
>
> Sorry, where does it say this is regarding a TDM connection?
>
Doesn't make any difference 'how' one might ping a remote site,
ping will never qualify the Quality of the channel between two points.
It will only suggest its up/down and possibly the delay at that
specific point in time. Has nothing to do with whether packets were
dropped or delayed some millisec
On 12 Jul 2004 at 8:22, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> On Monday 12 July 2004 05:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Not trying to get in the middle of whatever argument you're trying
> > > to make, the poster's original question (although probably not
> > > worded all that clear) can be answered by...
On 12 Jul 2004 at 14:06, Michael Bielicki wrote:
> how do you ping a TDM connection ?
Sorry, where does it say this is regarding a TDM connection?
I use IAX trunking and a ping script to check times and fluctuations
to my remote offices.
Matt Riddell
> On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 11:43, [EMAIL PROT
On Monday 12 July 2004 05:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Not trying to get in the middle of whatever argument you're trying to
> > make, the poster's original question (although probably not worded all
> > that clear) can be answered by... no, asterisk cannot make a decision
> > to route calls vi
how do you ping a TDM connection ?
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 11:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2004 at 19:16, Rich Adamson wrote:
>
> > > QoS is most certainly an issue when making the decision to move off
> > > the PSTN. Is the performance of your VoIP system going to be
> > > comparable to
On 11 Jul 2004 at 19:16, Rich Adamson wrote:
> > QoS is most certainly an issue when making the decision to move off
> > the PSTN. Is the performance of your VoIP system going to be
> > comparable to the performance of your PSTN system? Sounds like a
> > reasonable question to me.
>
> Not trying
> QoS is most certainly an issue when making the decision to move off the
> PSTN. Is the performance of your VoIP system going to be comparable to the
> performance of your PSTN system? Sounds like a reasonble question to me.
Not trying to get in the middle of whatever argument you're trying to
m
Street
Suite 100
San Francisco, CA
94107-1901
Asterisk Services and Training
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Stephen J. Wilcox
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 3:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
hould be a tutorial rather than
a talk. Anyone have presences?
Cheers,
Rich
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Rich Adamson
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 3:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Use
Both the question and the answer are not talking about QoS.
>From the Q, qos does not provide a measure of quality, it provides a system to
allow you to request your data be handled according to priorities.
>From the A, qos is confused with the pstn.. qos is a feature of IP, that has
nothing to
This is a very complex question.
First, you have to ask about VoIP and QoS. This is because * uses VoIP
protocols like UDP and RTP. In general, the QoS of VoIP is not as high as
with the PSTN. Even so, call quality can be generally very good.
Second, * does support features that support QoS, fo
> Does asterisk provide quality of service(QoS)? If it does, how do I use
> it? The reason why I ask is that I need to switch to use POTS should the
> internet connection becomes poor?
Asterisk 'participates' in the qos process by allowing you to set TOS
bits in the IP header. For example:
In si
Does asterisk provide quality of service(QoS)? If it does, how do I use
it? The reason why I ask is that I need to switch to use POTS should the
internet connection becomes poor?
Thanks,
Jim
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Looking at the wiki on QoS is very helpful.
>
> But just wondered if there is anyone who
> would want to comment on "ip rtp header-compression"?
>
> Is it a good thing, does it help on T1 or slower connections?
>
> Also why does Cisco often suggest the MultiLink thing?
H
Looking at the wiki on QoS is very helpful.
But just wondered if there is anyone who
would want to comment on "ip rtp header-compression"?
Is it a good thing, does it help on T1 or slower connections?
Also why does Cisco often suggest the MultiLink thing?
--
respectfully, Joseph - (606) 477-23
Using the sveasoft firmware on a WRT54GS (newer version of the G,
about $20 more) the QOS feature does work. It's not quite as robust as
a corporate-grade router, but it does work well for me, ensuring that
I set aside 100k of bandwidth any time my VoIP box is running.
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:03:03
I use the open source m0n0wall software running on Soekris Engineering
net4501.
Have also used Linksys BEFSR-81 with QoS, but the v1 hardware had a
problem with random loss of wan<>lan connectivity. Reports are that
v3,3 hardware does not. The firmware allows physical port based
priority, ie hi/me
Which cable/dsl routers on the market are QoS aware?
I know about the linksys WRT54G with a hacked firmware and I have been
looking at other routers' specs but no clear mention of the feature.
Thanks
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
What IOS version has a fix for this bug and what IOS should work in QoS in
ethernet.
regards
>I remember seeing a notice about a fix about a month ago, don't remember
any
specifics. The actual bug was a weird one and required simultaneous use of
QoS output service policies, PBR, and multicast
appen.
Timothy R. McKee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 17:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] QoS in Cisco
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 15:02, Timothy R. McKee wrote:
> Here is what I
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 15:02, Timothy R. McKee wrote:
> Here is what I use on a customer's router. He has a mix of different
> IP phones which make it a little strange, but it seems to work. Be
> aware that setting COS on an ethernet had severe bugs up until a
> service release a month or so ago.
On Friday 04 June 2004 15:00, it.albertchong.p8.hq.us wrote:
> I want to configure QoS in my Cisco router and Cisco Switch.. Need some
> information.
I just posted a sample config to this list this week. I suggest searching the
mailing list archives for my posts.
Regards,
Andrew
___
e 04, 2004
15:01To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[Asterisk-Users] QoS in Cisco
Dear all,
I want to configure QoS in my
Cisco router and Cisco Switch.. Need some information.
Need your help.
Best regards
IT Department
Director of Information
Technology
Albert
Chong
562-695-8823Ext. 2201
Dear
all,
I want
to configure QoS in my Cisco router and Cisco
Switch.. Need some information.
Need your
help.
Best regards
IT Department
Director of Information
Technology
Albert Chong
562-695-8823Ext. 2201
The hfsc packed scheduler can do this (more or less). You'll need the
latest kernel plus a lot of moxie.
John
Vic Cross wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 02:08 am, Michael Welter wrote:
MW> Using iptables, I can munge VoIP packet headers to indicate the desired
MW> quality of service.
MW>
MW> Can this
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 02:08 am, Michael Welter wrote:
MW> Using iptables, I can munge VoIP packet headers to indicate the desired
MW> quality of service.
MW>
MW> Can this Linux box, acting as a router, actually manage outbound packets
MW> to give priority to voice traffic? Separate outbound packets
Using iptables, I can munge VoIP packet headers to indicate the desired
quality of service.
Can this Linux box, acting as a router, actually manage outbound packets
to give priority to voice traffic? Separate outbound packets into
different queues depending on QoS?
Thanks,
--
Michael Welter
> > I would be surprised to find this. Typically ISP's will reset all QOS
> > settings to 0 either on your CPE router if they manage it or on the
> > aggregation router your circuit is connected to. Almost always if they
> > support DSCP/TOS matching and priority queuing in the core of their
> >
> Rich,
> I would be surprised to find this. Typically ISP's will reset all QOS
> settings to 0 either on your CPE router if they manage it or on the
> aggregation router your circuit is connected to. Almost always if they
> support DSCP/TOS matching and priority queuing in the core of their
- Original Message -
From: "Dustin Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] QoS anyone?
> Rich,
> I would be surprised to find this. Typically ISP's will reset all QOS
&
Rich,
I would be surprised to find this. Typically ISP's will reset all QOS
settings to 0 either on your CPE router if they manage it or on the
aggregation router your circuit is connected to. Almost always if they
support DSCP/TOS matching and priority queuing in the core of their
network it
> > Has anyone played around with QoS or TOS relative to * and sip phones?
> >
> > I was just doing a little real-time research and noticed our C7960's
> > mark IP packets with "low delay" and "high throughput" (presumably due
> > to tos_media: 5 in the SIPDefault config file), and rtp packets flo
Rich Adamson wrote:
Has anyone played around with QoS or TOS relative to * and sip phones?
I was just doing a little real-time research and noticed our C7960's
mark IP packets with "low delay" and "high throughput" (presumably due
to tos_media: 5 in the SIPDefault config file), and rtp packets fl
Has anyone played around with QoS or TOS relative to * and sip phones?
I was just doing a little real-time research and noticed our C7960's
mark IP packets with "low delay" and "high throughput" (presumably due
to tos_media: 5 in the SIPDefault config file), and rtp packets flowing
"from" asteris
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> If your DSL link is the bottleneck, rather than earlier hops back
> through the providers network, the provider could also prioritize VOIP
> packets going up the DSL line. That requires a cooperating provider,
> of course.
Not strictly.
Other TCP tra
> If your DSL link is the bottleneck, rather than earlier hops back
> through the providers network, the provider could also prioritize VOIP
> packets going up the DSL line. That requires a cooperating provider,
> of course.
You may also setup a linux box (or another QoS supporting router) on the
hi fred,
i don't know if this question has been already answered...
i haven't tested it whit asterisk YET, (i have to)
check the following links:
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/other-formats/html_single/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO.html
and tell
Nick,
> Apologies as not really an Asterisk question - QOS. I have been told to
> implement VOIP correctly you need QOS implemented across the network as
> a whole. What network switches support this?
That is a very safe statement to make.
In the real corporate world, QoS may not always be requi
Pretty much anything from Cisco or Foundry support QOS. Linux and BSD
support it as well.
-sb
-Original Message-
From: Nick Knight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] QOS
Hello all,
Apologies as not
Hello all,
Apologies as not really an Asterisk question - QOS. I have been told to
implement VOIP correctly you need QOS implemented across the network as
a whole. What network switches support this?
Regards
Nick
___
Asterisk-Users mailing li
"Adams, Gavin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For Cisco routers, look at the fair-queuing modes (but stay away from
> weighted fair queuing as that can have a deleterious effect on VoIP
> traffic).
>
> Under Linux, check out http://lartc.org/ which deals with configuring
> routing under Linux with
> Has anyone run * on a production system with voice and
> data.
Working on it. Mixed results so far.
> If a linux router is need can that run on the * box to
> reduce cost?
Outgoing is easy -- use lartc.org's script and do a little customization to
taste. My biggest problem has been incoming
> -Original Message-
> From: Perry E. Metzger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> fred alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can anyone share what has to be done to secure the
> > voice and throttle back the data?
>
> Many routers allow you to prioritize certain types of traffic --
> eff
> >If a linux router is need can that run on the * box to
> >reduce cost?
> >
> >All help is gratefully received, so I can plan a
> >multi-office rollout.
> >
> >Fred
> >
> You can't use QOS on the internet.. Its just not supported..
>
> *IF* your ADSL router supports QOS it will only be effectiv
WipeOut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You can't use QOS on the internet.. Its just not supported..
>
> *IF* your ADSL router supports QOS it will only be effective on
> outbaound traffic.. Inbound would still come in as it always has..
If your DSL link is the bottleneck, rather than earlier hops
fred alexander wrote:
Searching the archives there has been some discussion
about the need for QOS routing on a mixed voice data
broadband like ADSL.
Has anyone run * on a production system with voice and
data.
Can anyone share what has to be done to secure the
voice and throttle back the data?
If
fred alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anyone share what has to be done to secure the
> voice and throttle back the data?
Many routers allow you to prioritize certain types of traffic --
effectively letting the packets "jump the queue". If you strictly
prioritize the voice packets over
Searching the archives there has been some discussion
about the need for QOS routing on a mixed voice data
broadband like ADSL.
Has anyone run * on a production system with voice and
data.
Can anyone share what has to be done to secure the
voice and throttle back the data?
If a linux router is n
: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:10 PM
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] QoS On *
>
>
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have been looking for a while for informatoin about how QoS is assured
> in
> > Asterisk, but I haven't found a thing. Can someone give
Hi!
I have been looking for a while for informatoin about how QoS is assured in
Asterisk, but I haven't found a thing. Can someone give me some tips about
that?
Thanks,
Best regards,
Mireia
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://li
Hi!
I have a technical question. How does asterisk control the Qos? How does it
works?
Thanks a lot,
Regards,
Mireia
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
I have 2 PBX linked together with IAX using the GSM codec. This link is
over a T1
that is shared with other traffic. I know that it is problematic using
ethernet to control
QOS so I would like to hear some practical solutions from other users.
___
As
Hi
I have a gw linux in this machine i have one quicknet card, how i can
reserver a prt of my bandwidth to voice data, for example when i download a
big file the voice don't loss quality
thanks
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Kim C. Callis wrote:
> I was thinking of adding QoS to my Linux based router. I thought I would
> add all my IP phones and my * box into a VLAN, and then would do a QoS
> setup for that particular VLAN. Has anyone did any QoS setups for better
> performance? Has it made any change to the performan
Jeremy McNamara wrote:
No need to get all crazy with VLANs... just setup a Hierarchal Token
Bucket Queue. That is if your edge device is linux
Don't reckon you'd have any sample scripts in hand to help the intrepid
but inexperienced HTB person make that happen?
Thx.
B.
__
No need to get all crazy with VLANs... just setup a Hierarchal Token
Bucket Queue. That is if your edge device is linux
Jeremy McNamara
Kim C. Callis wrote:
I was thinking of adding QoS to my Linux based router. I thought I
would add all my IP phones and my * box into a VLAN, and then would
101 - 200 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
