Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
caller in a multi-caller (eg, 2 people or more) or even an app. So if
both people in a call are sending G.729 encoded data, and your app
decodes the *mixed* G.729 into ulaw (or slinear or any other decoded
format it outputs) requiring a single instance of the decoder,
On 1 Feb 2007, at 14:14, Lacy Moore - Aspendora wrote:
On 2/1/07, Andy Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I would expect to happen, is that Asterisk would transcode
between the ulaw/alaw party, and me, wanting to listen via
g729. Is
this what *should* happen ? Worth noting that
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 12:00 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 11:36:28 -0500
From: Andy Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Question on G.729 (was: H.264 *Not
Patented*)
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Hi,
I asked some questions here about G.729 earlier in the week, and it
looks like it would fit the bill for compressing audio between my *
server in colocation and sip phone at home.
This is what I want my setup to look like.
(Wont make sense unless you are using a fixed width font)
On 2/1/07, Andy Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I would expect to happen, is that Asterisk would transcode
between the ulaw/alaw party, and me, wanting to listen via g729. Is
this what *should* happen ? Worth noting that my provider does not
support G.729. Is what is happening a bug
