Hi,
I am using 1.6.2.11, and I need to be able to include the name of the
channel that answered a call in the call-recording filename.
At a guess we need to use the Queue(name,,macro) or
Dial(chan1&chan2,,M(macro)) and use the macro to update the call
recording filename. But, the macro runs o
Steve Davies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using 1.6.2.11, and I need to be able to include the name of the
> channel that answered a call in the call-recording filename.
>
> At a guess we need to use the Queue(name,,macro) or
> Dial(chan1&chan2,,M(macro)) and use the macro to update the call
> recordi
On 9 September 2010 17:52, Antonio Berrios
wrote:
> Steve Davies wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using 1.6.2.11, and I need to be able to include the name of the
>> channel that answered a call in the call-recording filename.
>>
>> At a guess we need to use the Queue(name,,macro) or
>> Dial(chan1&cha
On 09/09/10 17:59, Steve Davies wrote:
> On 9 September 2010 17:52, Antonio Berrios
> wrote:
>
>> Steve Davies wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am using 1.6.2.11, and I need to be able to include the name of the
>>> channel that answered a call in the call-recording filename.
>>>
>>> At a gu
On 11 September 2010 20:36, Antonio Berrios
wrote:
> On 09/09/10 17:59, Steve Davies wrote:
>> On 9 September 2010 17:52, Antonio Berrios
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Steve Davies wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I am using 1.6.2.11, and I need to be able to include the name of the
channel that answered a
On 09/13/2010 10:11 AM, Steve Davies wrote:
> On 11 September 2010 20:36, Antonio Berrios
> wrote:
>> On 09/09/10 17:59, Steve Davies wrote:
>>> On 9 September 2010 17:52, Antonio Berrios
>>> wrote:
>>>
Steve Davies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using 1.6.2.11, and I need to b
On 13 September 2010 11:07, Antonio Berrios
wrote:
> Gotcha. Yeah, I'm looking at implementing that (searching call
> recordings by agent that took the call) here but since our asterisk call
> recording is a separate server to the ones dealing with queues I'll be
> looking at tie-ing the agent to
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:22 +0100, Steve Davies wrote:
> On 13 September 2010 11:07, Antonio Berrios
> wrote:
> > Gotcha. Yeah, I'm looking at implementing that (searching call
> > recordings by agent that took the call) here but since our asterisk call
> > recording is a separate server to the on
On 13 September 2010 16:58, Carlos Chavez wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:22 +0100, Steve Davies wrote:
>> On 13 September 2010 11:07, Antonio Berrios
>> wrote:
>> > Gotcha. Yeah, I'm looking at implementing that (searching call
>> > recordings by agent that took the call) here but since our as