Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

It is a shame we were unable to find the solution to your problem. Do you want to setup a test system like the good one and let me access it to check what is going on? I am really really curious. Leandro Il giorno 26/gen/2013 19:49, "Dan Journo" ha scritto: > > It is really unbelievable ... I wa

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

> It is really unbelievable ... I was thinking: Asterisk uses an internal > database to maintain states of peers. It is usually located in > /var/lib/asterisk/astdb and it is a berkely db, but other database backends > seem available. Are you sharing also this database between the two servers?

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

2013/1/25 Dan Journo > >> Upgrading to the latest version didn't help. After about 30 minutes, > Asterisk2 tries to send out OPTIONS keepalive packets to peers listed as > Registered on Asterisk1. > > > It is something really amazing... Can you run "sip show peers" on each > one of the server

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

>> Upgrading to the latest version didn't help. After about 30 minutes, >> Asterisk2 tries to send out OPTIONS keepalive packets to peers listed as >> Registered on Asterisk1. > It is something really amazing... Can you run "sip show peers" on each one of > the servers and post the response? >

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

2013/1/24 Dan Journo > > I am curious, is your version of asterisk correctly compiling the > regserver field? Each server needs to have a distinct server name. > > ** ** > > Upgrading to the latest version didn't help. After about 30 minutes, > Asterisk2 tries to send out OPTIONS keepalive pa

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

> I am curious, is your version of asterisk correctly compiling the regserver > field? Each server needs to have a distinct server name. Upgrading to the latest version didn't help. After about 30 minutes, Asterisk2 tries to send out OPTIONS keepalive packets to peers listed as Registered on As

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

2013/1/24 Dan Journo > >> Its probably an issue with the version of Asterisk we are using > because I haven't had this problem in the past. > > > I am running the latest 1.8 version. Which version are you running? > > ** ** > > ** ** > > 1.8.15.0. I'll upgrade it to 1.8.20.1 when I can an

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

>> Its probably an issue with the version of Asterisk we are using because I >> haven't had this problem in the past. > I am running the latest 1.8 version. Which version are you running? 1.8.15.0. I'll upgrade it to 1.8.20.1 when I can and see if it makes a difference. -- _

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

On 13-01-23 04:41 AM, Dan Journo wrote: Hi, We're trying to decide whether to switch back to a static file for sip.conf. Currently we use mysql realtime but can't see any real benefit. Why would someone choose realtime sip over static files? Thanks I'm interested in the feedback too. For ye

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

2013/1/23 Dan Journo > > Maybe you are lacking some of the configuration. These is the relevant > part. > > ** ** > > > rtcachefriends=yes > > > rtsavesysname=yes > > > rtupdate=yes > > > rtautoclear=yes > > ** ** > > We have > > rtcachefriends=yes >

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

> Maybe you are lacking some of the configuration. These is the relevant part. > rtcachefriends=yes > rtsavesysname=yes > rtupdate=yes > rtautoclear=yes We have rtcachefriends=yes rtsavesysname=yes and these we don't have but they are set to YES by default > rtupdate=yes > rtautoclear=yes Its p

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

2013/1/23 Dan Journo > > We have never experienced that and use realtime with multiple asterisk > servers. > > We've only recently started seeing the problem. > > To simplify the issue, assuming we have two servers, Asterisk1 and > Asterisk2... > > Asterisk1 is a primary server and Asterisk2 is a

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

> We have never experienced that and use realtime with multiple asterisk > servers. We've only recently started seeing the problem. To simplify the issue, assuming we have two servers, Asterisk1 and Asterisk2... Asterisk1 is a primary server and Asterisk2 is a backup and used as a failover. As

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 05:53 -0500, Dan Journo wrote: > For example, I've noticed that if two asterisk servers share the > database, often they both think that the peer is registered. Also the > issues with MWI and Qualify= We have never experienced that and use realtime with multiple asterisk serv

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

>All depends by the number of sip peers and the number of addition/deletion you >make. If you have static files, you have to "sip reload" every time you >add/remove a peer. With realtime is all "realtime". I have switched to >realtime peers some times ago with great benefit. However, there are

Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

2013/1/23 Dan Journo > Hi, > > ** ** > > We're trying to decide whether to switch back to a static file for > sip.conf. Currently we use mysql realtime but can't see any real benefit.* > *** > > ** ** > > Why would someone choose realtime sip over static files? > > ** ** > > Thanks >

[asterisk-users] Realtime vs Static Files

Hi, We're trying to decide whether to switch back to a static file for sip.conf. Currently we use mysql realtime but can't see any real benefit. Why would someone choose realtime sip over static files? Thanks Dan Journo Kesher Communications (UK) Business Phone Systems