Any recommendations on good wireless SIP phones?
Thanks,
Pedram
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/ast
The latest Nokia phones come with a SIP client and I like them.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Pedram M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any recommendations on good wireless SIP phones?
>
> Thanks,
> Pedram
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Pedram M wrote:
> Any recommendations on good wireless SIP phones?
Siemens or Snom DECT phones. Although I prefer the Siemens.
Or did you mean Wi-Fi? In which case I don't recommend any of them. I used
the SIP client in my Nokia E90, but it's more a gimmick than any real
us
Use snom M3 Siemens got some problems.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Pedram M wrote:
Any recommendations on good wireless SIP phones?
VoIP Tech Chat did a review on the Linksys WIP 330:
http://tinyurl.com/review330
and VoIP Supply has a new phone (haven't read any reviews) that has a
new long-life battery.
Fred Posner
smime.p7s
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Pedram M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any recommendations on good wireless SIP phones?
I use a Siemens S675IP in our two person office. It performs very
well, and has a built in answering machine which is of interest for us
because we have several SIP accounts that
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:01:09 +0100, randulo wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Pedram M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any recommendations on good wireless SIP phones?
>
>I use a Siemens S675IP in our two person office. It performs very
>well, and has a built in answering machine which is of in
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Michael Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The S675/685IP supports G.722 which is great! But it has no mute
> button, which is a drag. Also, its less expensive.
Truth be told, I hate that there's no mute button. Also, the handset
isn't good enough to make a huge qu
Wi-Fi SIP phones aren't limited to hot spots. I am in the process of setting
up asterisk for SOHO. At present I'm not even using VoIP trunking, only LAN to
stns and I intend to use Wi-Fi instead of analog cordless phone. I got the
Engenius one, and it works, but I haven't played with it much.
--Original Message Text---
From: Wilton Helm
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:34:35 -0700
Wi-Fi SIP phones aren't limited to hot spots. I am in the process of
setting up asterisk for SOHO. At present I'm not even using VoIP
trunking, only LAN to stns and I intend to use Wi-Fi instead of analog
cordless
Wilton Helm wrote:
> Wi-Fi SIP phones aren't limited to hot spots. I am in the process of
> setting up asterisk for SOHO. At present I'm not even using VoIP
> trunking, only LAN to stns and I intend to use Wi-Fi instead of analog
> cordless phone. I got the Engenius one, and it works, but I have
Wilton Helm wrote:
> Good points. I got an access point instead of a router specifically
> so I could locate it in the best position. IMO Wi-Fi routers are dumb
> by definition because where you want a router is probably NOT anywhere
> close to the best point for the Wi-Fi part. This unit has
You can sometimes find the older Cisco Aironet boxes that run at 900Mhz.
That frequency is AWESOME in rural areas. Mountains will still block
it, but trees and water does not.
Drew Gibson wrote:
> Wilton Helm wrote:
>> Good points. I got an access point instead of a router specifically
>> s
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:05:46 -0500, Drew Gibson wrote:
>Wilton Helm wrote:
>> Good points. I got an access point instead of a router specifically
>> so I could locate it in the best position. IMO Wi-Fi routers are dumb
>> by definition because where you want a router is probably NOT anywhere
>"naturally wooded" does not bode well for WiFi
True, and it's even worse for the 5.6 GHz stuff that most of DECT is using
these days! The marketing departments have everyone convinced that bigger
frequency numbers are better. For most real-world environments the exact
opposite is true. The
>It's definitely possible to make wifi work for half a mile and you don't even
>need a >600mw transmitter to do that - however, wifi is all about receive
>strength, and so >you are unlikely to get a significantly better coverage with
>a high power hotspot >which is suboptimally placed. If you d
16 matches
Mail list logo
