Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:15:40 -0500, jon pounder wrote: >What is nice is when the $50 hardware and the $1000 hardware run exactly >the same software so other than the drivers for the hardware itself, >everything else behaves the same way and its easy to move around >configurations to grow. (I am

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On 11/19/2010 10:10 AM, Michael Graves wrote: > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:43:28 + (GMT), Gordon Henderson wrote: > > >> Interestingly for commercial units, I've had the opposite experience - >> I've found that my (business) customers just will not pay for something >> tiny that's capable of su

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:43:28 + (GMT), Gordon Henderson wrote: >Interestingly for commercial units, I've had the opposite experience - >I've found that my (business) customers just will not pay for something >tiny that's capable of supporting 30 phones... I did have a look at the >GuruPlug s

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

Hi, No we can not add a DSL modem.But i saw on the net that this works for call forward feature on TDM400 FXS card.So i tried it.The data is entering the CFIM family in the database which can be seen but only the call is not forwarded Regards, Aparna On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Olivier wro

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, John Novack wrote: > Not really "in production" But for a SIP/IAX Asterisk box, it works! > there is a Dockstar hacking site that "de-nuts" the boot code and allows > booting from a 1-2 gig flash ( I have not had good luck with 4 and 8 gig > flash, but it could be the flash st

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

> > I never saw the point of spending $100 for something that is so limited. > You can spend a little more and get something like an ALIX board that > is so much more capable and still fanless/low power. > > http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm > > The 2d3/2d13 are very nice for the price. > > Hi, Ca

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Darrick Hartman wrote: > On 11/18/2010 07:52 AM, Gilles wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:42:33 -0500, Mark Deneen >> wrote: >>> Are you saying ADSL as in a generic term for broadband router or do >>> you really mean that the router also acts as a DSL transceiver? >

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, John Novack wrote: > > >> AstLinux on various embedded hardware really works well. I have several on >> older HP Thin Clients, 55xx series, some >> with only 128 Meg of ram. A replacement flash from Transcend and a 55xx of >> eBay can be easi

[asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

Hello For users who 1) don't have a QoS-capable ADSL router and 2) would like to run Asterisk with a couple of SIP trunks, I was wondering what hardware is recommend to run any of the main open-source *WRT projects to which Asterisk has been ported: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wireless_

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:42:33 -0500, Mark Deneen > wrote: >>Are you saying ADSL as in a generic term for broadband router or do >>you really mean that the router also acts as a DSL transceiver? > > Sorry about that. Ideally, the unit should be both

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, John Novack wrote: > AstLinux on various embedded hardware really works well. I have several on > older HP Thin Clients, 55xx series, some > with only 128 Meg of ram. A replacement flash from Transcend and a 55xx of > eBay can be easily under $50. > the GUI in AstLinux mak

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

AstLinux on various embedded hardware really works well. I have several on older HP Thin Clients, 55xx series, some with only 128 Meg of ram. A replacement flash from Transcend and a 55xx of eBay can be easily under $50. the GUI in AstLinux makes life simple for users who want to make minor chan

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Gilles wrote: > Hello > > For users who 1) don't have a QoS-capable ADSL router and 2) would > like to run Asterisk with a couple of SIP trunks, I was wondering what > hardware is recommend to run any of the main open-source *WRT projects > to which Asterisk has be

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, jon pounder wrote: > I have a similar setup in an office but sip directly back to the main > server - not sure what the value add to the local asterisk is, except > "intercom" calls would not have to leave the lan, but isn't that the purpose > of reinvite ? > Whe

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On 11/18/2010 10:02 AM, Chris Gentle wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Gilles > wrote: Hello For users who 1) don't have a QoS-capable ADSL router and 2) would like to run Asterisk with a couple of SIP trunks, I was wondering what hardware is r

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Gilles wrote: > Hello > > For users who 1) don't have a QoS-capable ADSL router and 2) would > like to run Asterisk with a couple of SIP trunks, I was wondering what > hardware is recommend to run any of the main open-source *WRT projects > to which Asterisk has b

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On 11/18/2010 07:52 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:42:33 -0500, Mark Deneen > wrote: >> Are you saying ADSL as in a generic term for broadband router or do >> you really mean that the router also acts as a DSL transceiver? > > Sorry about that. Ideally, the unit should be both an ADSL m

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommended *WRT router to run Asterisk?

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:42:33 -0500, Mark Deneen wrote: >Are you saying ADSL as in a generic term for broadband router or do >you really mean that the router also acts as a DSL transceiver? Sorry about that. Ideally, the unit should be both an ADSL modem + router, but apparently, most of them are