Re: [asterisk-users] Registration of Snom 320phonewithAsterisk 1.4.13

2007-10-30 Thread Jason White
I can confirm that this problem occurs in the latest svn version (revision 87498) as well. What's the best way to work with the developers to have this tracked down and addressed? I assume it needs to become a bug report. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation

Re: [asterisk-users] Registration of Snom 320phonewithAsterisk 1.4.13

2007-10-29 Thread Jason White
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:19:49AM +, Steve Davies wrote: > snom phones have been using ports in the 2000+ range since the dawn of > asterisk without any problems, so I suspect that this will be an > Asterisk configuration error, or a change to the asterisk SIP stack > that is causing problem

Re: [asterisk-users] Registration of Snom 320phonewithAsterisk 1.4.13

2007-10-29 Thread Steve Davies
L PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Jason White > Gesendet: Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 10:01 > An: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Betreff: Re: [asterisk-users] Registration of Snom 320phonewithAsterisk 1.4.13 > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 0

Re: [asterisk-users] Registration of Snom 320phonewithAsterisk 1.4.13

2007-10-29 Thread Jason White
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:19:57AM +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote: > What you can still to is setting the port on the phone to port 5060 - just > as a little dirty workaround until there is a better solution available. Would that be the sip_port settings entry? It is documented as "for internal

Re: [asterisk-users] Registration of Snom 320phonewithAsterisk 1.4.13

2007-10-29 Thread Christian Stredicke
10:01 An: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Betreff: Re: [asterisk-users] Registration of Snom 320phonewithAsterisk 1.4.13 On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:22:21AM +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote: > Well, the response should go to the port number provided in the Via header. &