-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman
Lesher
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID
On 2 Jul 2010, at 13:31, unsero...@aol.com wrote:
> I just did not want to spam the list with useless content but just reply to
> you as you attacked me.
> This was the reason i only replied to you and not to the whole list.
> But as i realised now it seems to be usual to spam the whole mailing
mail from me) instead of
concentrating on the "real" topic, e.g. "Remote Party ID issue".
-Original Message-
From: Steve Howes
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Sent: Fri, Jul 2, 2010 2:15 pm
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID i
On 2 Jul 2010, at 12:29, John Novack wrote:
> regardless, people will post either way, and wasting archive space
> complaining about either one is pointless.
I was mainly pissed off about him directly replying to people (i.e. me) rather
than the list. It was you lot that started the religious
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> On Thursday 01 July 2010 20:45:14 John Novack wrote:
>
>> John Ervin wrote:
>>
>>> Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious.
>>>
>>>
It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored.
>> Further s
On Thursday 01 July 2010 20:45:14 John Novack wrote:
> John Ervin wrote:
> > Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious.
> >
> >> It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored.
>
> Further searching shows there is NO written rule regarding top bottom or
> e
John Ervin wrote:
> Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious.
>> It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored.
>
>
Further searching shows there is NO written rule regarding top bottom or
even sideways posting
http://www.asterisk.org/community/rules
Wh
John Ervin wrote:
> Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious.
>> It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored.
>
>
One might go here :
http://www.asterisk.org/support/mailing-lists
But the link to "rules" is broken!!
John Novack
--
Dog is my Co-
Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious.
It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman
Lesher
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 3:16 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID
Sorry to answer my own question here - had a look at the headers of
Tilghman's last email and it contained this:
" X-message-flag: Major security vulnerability detected! You should shutdown
your computer immediately and upgrade to Ubuntu Linux 8.04 or
later."
Cute. Leaving aside the fact
As an interesting aside, every email I get on this list coming from Tilghman
Lesher is marked with a "To Do" flag by my email client. Every single one.
I don't have any inbound filter that would explain the behavior either.
On 7/1/10 1:15 PM, "Tilghman Lesher" wrote:
> On Thursday 01 July 2010
On Thursday 01 July 2010 15:01:45 Danny Nicholas wrote:
> On Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:37 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
> > Steve Howes wrote:
> > > DON'T reply to people off list. And stop bloody top posting.
> >
> > Is bottom posting your personal preference or is that a rule on this
> > list? I have
TY, John.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Novack
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 3:06 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party
A religious argument that will not be resolved or go away
Top posting to some doesn't work because of their mail clients
Bottom posting is a PITA to many because some don't trim off signatures
and other un-necessary text.
Much archive space and bandwidth is wasted on this subject, which will
not
asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:37 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue
> DON'T reply to people off list. And
> DON'T reply to people off list. And stop bloody top posting.
>
> Steve
>
>
Is bottom posting your personal preference or is that a rule on this
list? I have personally always found top posting easier to follow
because the newer content is at the top.
--
_
On 1 Jul 2010, at 16:56, unsero...@aol.com wrote:
>
> Sorry, i wanted to know what "is in trunk" means.
> So it seems to mean "is in the pipeline for the next version".
DON'T reply to people off list. And stop bloody top posting.
Steve
--
___
On 1 Jul 2010, at 16:25, unsero...@aol.com wrote:
> Sorry, what does this mean? Only in trunk?
If you look in the post you quoted
"This feature is in Asterisk trunk and will be present in the upcoming 1.8
release."
First sentence.
S
--
___
Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:25 AM, wrote:
> Sorry, what does this mean? Only in trunk?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Howes
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>
> Sent: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 5:02 pm
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users]
Sorry, what does this mean? Only in trunk?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Howes
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Sent: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 5:02 pm
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue
On 1 Jul 2010, at 15:52, unsero...@aol.com wrote:
> [
Only in trunk...(1.8)
~
Andrew "lathama" Latham
lath...@gmail.com
* Learn more about OSS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software
* Learn more about Linux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux
* Learn more about Tux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tux
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Steve
On 1 Jul 2010, at 15:52, unsero...@aol.com wrote:
> [Jul 1 16:30:50] ERROR[3954]: pbx.c:2902 ast_func_write: Function
> CONNECTEDLINE not registered
> Same happens trying function CALLEDID.
>
> I am using Asterisk 1.6.1.20.
>
> What do i have to do to use this function or alternatively the f
Hi,
i have the same problem. Trying to use the dialplan function CONNECTEDLINE()
this way
Set(CONNECTEDLINE(name)=${SIPPEER(${EXTEN},callerid_name)})
Set(CONNECTEDLINE(num)=${EXTEN})
ends with
[Jul 1 16:30:50] ERROR[3954]: pbx.c:2902 ast_func_write: Function
CONNECTEDL
24 matches
Mail list logo