Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-15 Thread John Millican
On 03/13/2014 01:13 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: -1 Prefer top posting. Easy to see if I want to scroll down to see if it is something interesting to me. I get a lot of e-mails each day and scrolling wastes too much time. But if you have a solution to a problem that I raise, please feel free to po

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-14 Thread Ron Wheeler
If the sequence was really important, we would just move this whole list to a LinkedIn group and have a much better environment for following threads and managing the profiles of the group's members. This is a pretty old system of managing peer support but it always takes a while to get legacy s

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-14 Thread James B. Byrne
On Thu, March 13, 2014 15:32, Kevin Larsen wrote: >> On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote: >> > This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what? >> +1-1 = 0 I do not care about where people put their replies so long as I can figure out who is answering what. What I do not like to read

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Ron Wheeler
On 13/03/2014 9:32 PM, Don Kelly wrote: > On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote: > > This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what? > > Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly, > it all works beautifully. > Kevin Larson sez: Outlook can quote correctly

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread John Novack
Don Kelly wrote: > On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote: > > This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what? > > Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly, > it all works beautifully. > Kevin Larson sez: Outlook can quote correctly, but it is an all or

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Don Kelly
> On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote: > > This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what? > > Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly, > it all works beautifully. > Kevin Larson sez: Outlook can quote correctly, but it is an all or nothing setting it

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Jeremy Kister
On 3/13/2014 11:33 AM, A J Stiles wrote: If you need to make a point-by-point argument, split up your reply -- a critical piece to this component is proper quoting. the person replying needs to differentiate between what he is writing and what is is replying to. notice the > in front of what

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Kevin Larsen
> On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote: > > This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what? > > Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly, > it all works beautifully. > Outlook can quote correctly, but it is an all or nothing setting it would appear. Lo

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Chris Bagnall
On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote: This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what? Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly, it all works beautifully. On 13/3/14 5:13 pm, Ron Wheeler wrote: -1 Prefer top posting. Easy to see if I want to scroll do

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Eric Wieling
: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:39 PM To: rwhee...@artifact-software.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Michelle Dupuis
March 13, 2014 2:46 PM To: Asterisk Users List Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Terry Brummell Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:44 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-C

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Matt Hoskins
: Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:39 PM To: rwhee...@artifact-software.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Terry Brummell
-software.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:39 PM To: rwhee...@artifact-software.com; Asterisk Users

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Eric Wieling
: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Ron Wheeler wrote: > -1 > Prefer top posting. Your preferences are in conflict with the mailing list rules (http://www.asterisk.org/community/discuss), specifically #5. It has to be all one way or the other. This is an English languag

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Steve Edwards
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Ron Wheeler wrote: -1 Prefer top posting. Your preferences are in conflict with the mailing list rules (http://www.asterisk.org/community/discuss), specifically #5. It has to be all one way or the other. This is an English language list. Thus, the natural expectation i

Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread Ron Wheeler
-1 Prefer top posting. Easy to see if I want to scroll down to see if it is something interesting to me. I get a lot of e-mails each day and scrolling wastes too much time. But if you have a solution to a problem that I raise, please feel free to post it anywhere you like. On 13/03/2014 11:

[asterisk-users] Replying to Posts

2014-03-13 Thread A J Stiles
(If you want to reply to this message, this is not where your reply goes) Please, for the benefit of anyone reading the archives in search of answers to a question, when replying to messages on this list, can everyone try to follow the natural flow of conversation? That is, position your reply