to be a lot of
customization with our current web based system, which uses ColdFusion and
SQL 2K.
Thanks,
David
--
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:49:28 +
From: Marco Mouta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SER vs Asterisk?
To: Asterisk Users
]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SER vs Asterisk?
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
agents have the
option to click on desktop applications.
Steve
www.bicomsystems.com
steve 'at' bicomsystems dot com
- Original Message -
From: David Anderson
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 6:45 PM
Subject: [asterisk-users] SER vs Asterisk
We're going to be setting up Asterisk at our data center, as well as our
call center locations via an optical fiber point to point connection. Is it
best to have the servers communicate to eachother via SIP using SER, or just
use the Asterisk functions?
Thanks,
David
Only with Asterisk you can handle it, but of course it depends on your
requirements on scalability and redundancy needed.
How many agents? How many diferent locations? SIP trunk to your telco or
PSTN ? Remote Agents at home?
Post more details on your requirements and I believe there are so
We're having a problem with Asterisk when we try to pass a call off to a
Lucent PSTN using SIP. This behavior does not exist with SER:
With Asterisk
An ISDN call is started, at the T1 level we receive call proceeding
and immediately we receive a Call in Progress just like the far end
party
Why is SER considered a better SIPserver than asterisk , why is it that SER
can handle more clients than asterisk can. And if this is just cause of say
poor SIP handling code in asterisk then is there anything being done to fix
it. Just wanted to know why SER claims to be better than asterisk as a
Because SER does not process the RTP stream, it just directs it around.
Greg
Vikram Rangnekar wrote:
Why is SER considered a better SIPserver than asterisk , why is it that SER
can handle more clients than asterisk can. And if this is just cause of say
poor SIP handling code in asterisk then is
-Original Message-
From: Vikram Rangnekar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 January 2005 16:51
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SER vs Asterisk for SIP
Why is SER considered a better SIPserver than asterisk , why
is it that SER can handle more
is
also needed.
Aisling.
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SER vs Asterisk for SIP
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:50:39 +0100
Why is SER considered a better SIPserver than asterisk , why is it
that SER
can handle more
O'Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SER vs Asterisk for SIP
From my (fairly limited) understanding, I think the fundamental
difference is that Asterisk is a pbx (offering all the features
associated
Rich Adamson wrote:
Could someone give me a 10,000 foot view of what the differences are
between Ser and Asterisk?
I'd like to implement one or the other handle a small number of local
ip phones, tie a couple of asterisk (or ser) machines together across
the Internet, implement a couple of
Could someone give me a 10,000 foot view of what the differences are
between Ser and Asterisk?
I'd like to implement one or the other handle a small number of local
ip phones, tie a couple of asterisk (or ser) machines together across
the Internet, implement a couple of FX gateways (to handle
asterisk would be appropriate choice.
I don't think Ser has the ability to interface with the PSTN
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 12:03:02PM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
Could someone give me a 10,000 foot view of what the differences are
between Ser and Asterisk?
I'd like to implement one or
Rich Adamson wrote:
Could someone give me a 10,000 foot view of what the differences are
between Ser and Asterisk?
Asterisk is a PBX that you can use to connect SIP clients to the PSTN
or voicemail /IVR applications.
SER is a SIP proxy that connects SIP clients to each other.
Asterisk handles all
Could someone give me a 10,000 foot view of what the differences are
between Ser and Asterisk?
Asterisk is a PBX that you can use to connect SIP clients to the PSTN
or voicemail /IVR applications.
SER is a SIP proxy that connects SIP clients to each other.
Asterisk handles all media
16 matches
Mail list logo
