Re: [asterisk-users] SIP and NAT best practices since recent changes?

2012-01-11 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
erisk-users] SIP and NAT best practices since recent changes? On 11 January 2012 15:43, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:29 AM, Steve Davies wrote: > > Hi, > > Since the recent update to the NAT configuration options and defaults > in chan_sip.so, I am interested i

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP and NAT best practices since recent changes?

2012-01-11 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
From: "Steve Davies" Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:51 PM To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP and NAT best practices since recent changes? On 11 January

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP and NAT best practices since recent changes?

2012-01-11 Thread Steve Davies
On 11 January 2012 15:43, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > On 01/11/2012 05:29 AM, Steve Davies wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Since the recent update to the NAT configuration options and defaults >> in chan_sip.so, I am interested in any SIP/NAT best practices advice. >> >> What I've always done in the past is:

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP and NAT best practices since recent changes?

2012-01-11 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 01/11/2012 05:29 AM, Steve Davies wrote: Hi, Since the recent update to the NAT configuration options and defaults in chan_sip.so, I am interested in any SIP/NAT best practices advice. What I've always done in the past is: Global: nat=no SIP handsets that are local: nat=no SIP handsets that

[asterisk-users] SIP and NAT best practices since recent changes?

2012-01-11 Thread Steve Davies
Hi, Since the recent update to the NAT configuration options and defaults in chan_sip.so, I am interested in any SIP/NAT best practices advice. What I've always done in the past is: Global: nat=no SIP handsets that are local: nat=no SIP handsets that are remote: nat=yes ITSP SIP trunks: nat=yes