Re: [asterisk-users] Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at high call volumes - Low volume benchmarks

2007-06-01 Thread John Hughes
Matthew J. Roth wrote: This post contains the benchmarks for Asterisk at low call volumes on similar single and dual-core servers. I'd appreciate it greatly if you took the time to read and comment on it. For me all these numbers look too small to be useful for benchmarking.

Re: [asterisk-users] Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at high call volumes - Low volume benchmarks

2007-06-01 Thread Matthew J. Roth
John Hughes wrote: For me all these numbers look too small to be useful for benchmarking. John, They are small, and they are probably more useful as baseline numbers. I'm working on writing up some data I've collected off of our production switch. The call range is 0-450 at 10 call

Re: [asterisk-users] Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at high call volumes - Low volume benchmarks - Correction

2007-05-28 Thread Matthew J. Roth
Luki wrote: Perhaps a naive question, but how does 0.137% CPU utilization per call equal 1735 MHz per call? If 1735 MHz / 0.137% = 1735 MHz / 0.00137 = 1266423 MHz at 100% utilization ??! Even with 4 CPUs, those would be 316 GHz CPUs. I think you meant: Average CPU utilization per call: 0.137%

Re: [asterisk-users] Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at high call volumes - Low volume benchmarks

2007-05-28 Thread Matthew J. Roth
William Moore wrote: Are you recording memory figures as well and have you checked the total used memory? Or did I miss it somewhere? Thanks for doing this, scalability testing is always good. William, This round of benchmarking is heavily focused on CPU utilization, because it is causing

Re: [asterisk-users] Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at high call volumes - Low volume benchmarks

2007-05-26 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Saturday 26 May 2007 1:21 am, Edgar Guadamuz wrote: Very good... by the way, I'm studing electrical engineering and I've chosen asterisk scalation as my final graduation project. I hope do a similar work within and asterisk cluster. I've been working as an EE, and I've got to ask... what

Re: [asterisk-users] Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at high call volumes - Low volume benchmarks

2007-05-26 Thread Luki
Average CPU utilization per call: 0.137% (~1735 MHz) Perhaps a naive question, but how does 0.137% CPU utilization per call equal 1735 MHz per call? If 1735 MHz / 0.137% = 1735 MHz / 0.00137 = 1266423 MHz at 100% utilization ??! Even with 4 CPUs, those would be 316 GHz CPUs. I think you

Re: [asterisk-users] Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at high call volumes - Low volume benchmarks

2007-05-25 Thread Matthew J. Roth
List users, This post contains the benchmarks for Asterisk at low call volumes on similar single and dual-core servers. I'd appreciate it greatly if you took the time to read and comment on it. Thank you, Matthew Roth InterMedia Marketing Solutions Software Engineer and Systems Developer

Re: [asterisk-users] Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at high call volumes - Low volume benchmarks

2007-05-25 Thread William Moore
On 5/25/07, Matthew J. Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: List users, This post contains the benchmarks for Asterisk at low call volumes on similar single and dual-core servers. I'd appreciate it greatly if you took the time to read and comment on it. Are you recording memory figures as well and

Re: [asterisk-users] Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at high call volumes - Low volume benchmarks

2007-05-25 Thread Edgar Guadamuz
Very good... by the way, I'm studing electrical engineering and I've chosen asterisk scalation as my final graduation project. I hope do a similar work within and asterisk cluster. On 5/25/07, William Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/25/07, Matthew J. Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: List