On 08/03/2011 09:33 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Can you please elaborate on how to apply the patch?
Also, is the repository updated with the new code?
No, of course not. RPMs and DEBs are not patched, they are produced when
new releases are made. If you haven't seen a new release made that
includes th
Can you please elaborate on how to apply the patch?
Also, is the repository updated with the new code?
Regards,
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Richard Mudgett wrote:
> > Can you please point me to the patch that you just made?
> >
> The patch is committed to v1.6.2 SVN branch.
> Patch for v1
> Can you please point me to the patch that you just made?
>
The patch is committed to v1.6.2 SVN branch.
Patch for v1.6.2 only.
r330490 | jrose | 2011-08-01 16:08:10 -0500 (Mon, 01 Aug 2011) | 12 lines
Asterisk 18103 - Fix reload crash caused by destroying default parking lot
Default parking l
g List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <
> asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 3:03:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Serious bug in 1.6.2.19 - what is the time
> frame to fix such bugs?
>
> On 7/30/11 7:39 AM, Bruce B wrote:
> > I think th
g List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <
> asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 3:03:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Serious bug in 1.6.2.19 - what is the time
> frame to fix such bugs?
>
> On 7/30/11 7:39 AM, Bruce B wrote:
> > I
gt;
> Thanks for your patience,
> Jonathan R. Rose
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Vahan Yerkanian"
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <
> asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 3:03:
patience,
Jonathan R. Rose
- Original Message -
From: "Vahan Yerkanian"
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 3:03:07 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Serious bug in 1.6.2.19 - what is the time frame
to fix such bu
Thanks for feedback. Yeah, tell me about it. Your description is very
accurate of the situation. I can't believe it's in the repo without any
tests done; even the simplest reload. I don't mean to be a whiner but
honestly the repo is a joke with such an obvious flaw for so long
now
On Sun,
On 7/30/11 7:39 AM, Bruce B wrote:
I think this should be a quick fix since it's rendering the latest
stable version useless and making the impression that it was released
just to break things and force people onto 1.8x. Just a thought...no
blame game. But really something like this should be tac
I think this should be a quick fix since it's rendering the latest stable
version useless and making the impression that it was released just to break
things and force people onto 1.8x. Just a thought...no blame game. But
really something like this should be tackled quickly. No point to break
thing
On 07/29/2011 06:20 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
On 11-07-29 06:12 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Hi everyone,
Asterisk 1.6.2.19 has a bug per:
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18103
What is the general time to fix this? I think a similar thing is also
noted
in 1.8x install. Is it not going to
On 11-07-29 06:12 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Hi everyone,
Asterisk 1.6.2.19 has a bug per:
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18103
What is the general time to fix this? I think a similar thing is also noted
in 1.8x install. Is it not going to be taken care of because it's 1.6x ?
1.6.2.1
Hi everyone,
Asterisk 1.6.2.19 has a bug per:
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18103
What is the general time to fix this? I think a similar thing is also noted
in 1.8x install. Is it not going to be taken care of because it's 1.6x ?
Thanks
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
