Richard Lyman wrote:
> Paul wrote:
>
>> Richard Lyman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Paul wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Joe acquisto wrote:
> Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: 4/30/2007 8:53 AM:
>
>
>
>
>
>> Joe acquisto wrote:
>>
>>
Stephen Bosch wrote:
>Paul wrote:
>
>
Third - I have enough exposure to Visual FoxPro to quickly rule it out
as a choice for anything new. The fact that somebody is proposing to
use it might give you the idea that they don't know what they are
talking about at all. BTW - my ex
Paul wrote:
Richard Lyman wrote:
Paul wrote:
Joe acquisto wrote:
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: 4/30/2007 8:53 AM:
Joe acquisto wrote:
I have dual posted this to the user and biz lists.
Has anyone ever heard of someone running an
Paul wrote:
>>> Third - I have enough exposure to Visual FoxPro to quickly rule it out
>>> as a choice for anything new. The fact that somebody is proposing to
>>> use it might give you the idea that they don't know what they are
>>> talking about at all. BTW - my exposure to it did include thin
Richard Lyman wrote:
> Paul wrote:
>
>> Joe acquisto wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: 4/30/2007 8:53 AM:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Joe acquisto wrote:
> I have dual posted this to the user and biz lists.
>
> Has anyone ever heard of so
Paul wrote:
Joe acquisto wrote:
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: 4/30/2007 8:53 AM:
Joe acquisto wrote:
I have dual posted this to the user and biz lists.
Has anyone ever heard of someone running an Asterisk based system, yet
Has abandoning SugarCRM, and opting to dev
I fully understand that but the OP says the programmer "does not seem to
be comfortable with SugarCRM, MySQL and php". That is quite different
from "It's easier to build on the code I already have". If I had
resisted growth and change over the years, I might be looking for ways
to integrate FORTRAN
I have heard of people rejecting Sugar for their existing CRM/ERP product
based on VS Foxpro. I'm not a huge fan of Foxpro myself, but if the system
already exist then a lot of people see little advantage in changing.
On 4/30/07, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe acquisto wrote:
>Paul <[EMAI
Joe acquisto wrote:
>Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: 4/30/2007 8:53 AM:
>
>
>>Joe acquisto wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I have dual posted this to the user and biz lists.
>>>
>>>Has anyone ever heard of someone running an Asterisk based system, yet
>>>Has abandoning SugarCRM, and opting to develop th
Time Bandit wrote:
>> > First - vtiger is available for those who don't like the SugarCRM
>> > licensing.
>>
>> It's not a licensing complaint. At least that has not surfaced. It
>> is more that the programmer does not seem to be comfortable with
>> SugarCRM, MySQL and php. Biggest compliant abo
> First - vtiger is available for those who don't like the SugarCRM
> licensing.
It's not a licensing complaint. At least that has not surfaced. It is more
that the
programmer does not seem to be comfortable with SugarCRM, MySQL and php.
Biggest compliant about sugar is - hard to configure, do
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: 4/30/2007 8:53 AM:
> Joe acquisto wrote:
>
>>I have dual posted this to the user and biz lists.
>>
>>Has anyone ever heard of someone running an Asterisk based system, yet
>>Has abandoning SugarCRM, and opting to develop their own Visual FoxPro
>>Has database/CRM
Joe acquisto wrote:
>I have dual posted this to the user and biz lists.
>
>Has anyone ever heard of someone running an Asterisk based system, yet
>abandoning SugarCRM, and opting to develop their own Visual FoxPro
>database/CRM?
>
>Please don't dump on me now, this is not my idea, I am just aski
I have dual posted this to the user and biz lists.
Has anyone ever heard of someone running an Asterisk based system, yet
abandoning SugarCRM, and opting to develop their own Visual FoxPro database/CRM?
Please don't dump on me now, this is not my idea, I am just asking for
comments, to see if m
14 matches
Mail list logo
